Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to please download and re-post this video to every website possible. Make DVDs and place your activist group name on the menu. Edit pieces and RickrollYouTube with vaccine truth! This is public domain, and no permission is needed to copy, reproduce, and give away this video and information.
– Clint Richardson–
Not in babies: In a review of more than 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children it was found there was “no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shotwas any more effective than placebo. In children over 2 yrs, it was only effective 33% of the time in preventing the flu.
Not in children with asthma: A study 800 children with asthma, where one half were vaccinated and the other half did not receive the influenza vaccine. The two groups were compared with respect to clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. CONCLUSION: This study failed to provide evidence that the influenza vaccine prevents pediatric asthma exacerbations.
Reference: “Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for the prevention of asthma exacerbations.” Christly, C. et al. Arch Dis Child. 2004 Aug;89(8):734-5.
Not in children with asthma (2): “The inactivated flu vaccine, Flumist, does not prevent influenza-related hospitalizations in children, especially the ones with asthma…In fact, children who get the flu vaccine are more at risk for hospitalization than children who do not get the vaccine.”
Reference: The American Thoracic Society’s 105th International Conference, May 15-20, 2009, San Diego.
Not in adults: In a review of 48 reports including more than 66,000 adults, “Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6% and reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day (0.16) days. It did not change the number of people needing to go to hospital or take time off work.”
Reference: “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1 (2006).
Not in the Elderly: In a review of 64 studies in 98 flu seasons, For elderly living in nursing homes, flu shots were non-significant for preventing the flu. For elderly living in the community, vaccines were not (significantly) effective against influenza, ILI or pneumonia.
Reference: “Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.3 (2006).
Some of the new H1N1 (swine flu) vaccines are going to be made by Novartis. These shots will probably be made in PER.C6 cells (human retina cells) and contain MF59, a potentially debilitating adjuvant. MF-59 is an oil-based adjuvant primarily composed of squalene.
All rats injected with squalene (oil) adjuvants developed a disease that left them crippled, dragging their paralyzed hindquarters across their cages. Injected squalene can cause severe arthritis (3 on scale of 4) and severe immune responses, such as autoimmune arthritis and lupus.
Ref: (1): Kenney, RT. Edleman, R. “Survey of human-use adjuvants.” Expert Review of Vaccines. 2 (2003) p171.
Federal health officials are starting to recommend that most Americans get three flu shots this fall: one regular flu shot and two doses of the vaccine made against the new swine flu strain. School children who have never had a flu shot are targeted for four shots in the fall – twice for seasonal flu, twice for pandemic swine flu. (July 15, 2009 news)
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has been talking to school superintendents around the country, urging them to make plans to use buildings for mass vaccinations and for vaccinating kids first. (CBS News, June 12, 2009.)
Is Mandatory Vaccination Possible?
1946: US Public Health Service was established and Executive Order (EO) 9708 was signed, listing the communicable diseases where quarantines could be used. 1946 and 2003, cholera, diphtheria, TB, typhoid, smallpox, yellow fever, & viral hemorrhagic fevers were added.
April 4, 2003: EO 13295 added SARS to the list.
April 1, 2005: EO 13295 added “Influenza caused by novel or re-emergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.” EO 13295 also: The president gave the Sec. of HHS the power to quarantine, his or her discretion. Sec of HHS has the power to arrange for the “apprehension and examination of persons reasonably thought to be infected.” A cough or a fever could put a person at risk for being quarantined for an extended period of time without recourse.
January 28, 2003: Project BioShield was introduced during Bush’s State of the Union Address. This created permanent and indefinite funding authority to develop “medical countermeasures.”
The NIH was given authority to speed approval of drugs and vaccines. Emergency approval of a “fast tracked” drug and vaccine can be given without the regular course of safety testing.
December 17, 2006: Division E: The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA) was added as an addendum to Defense Appropriations Bill HR 2863 at 11:20p on Saturday night, long after House Committee members
had signed off on the bill and gone home for the holidays.
Section (b)(1) states: The Sec of HHS can make a determination that a “disease, health condition or threat” constitutes a public health emergency. He or she may then recommend “the manufacture, testing, development, administration, or use of one or more covered counter measures…” A covered countermeasure defined as a “pandemic product, vaccine or drug.”
Division E also provides complete liability protection for all drugs, vaccines or biological products deemed a “covered countermeasure” and used for an outbreak of any kind. In July, 2009, complete liability protection was extened to drug companies that included any product used for any public health emergency declared by Sec of HHS.
Pharma is now protected from all accountability, unless “criminal intent to do harm” can be proven by the injured party. They are protected from liability even if they know the drug will be harmful.
“By 1853, Parliament began passing laws to make the untested vaccine compulsory throughout the British Empire. Other countries of Europe followed suit. Once the economic implications of compulsory vaccinations were realized, few dared to disagree. Then, as now, the media were controlled by the vaccine manufacturers and the government, who stood to make huge money from the sale of these spurious vaccines.”… Tim O’Shea, D.C.
What can you do?
These are just a few suggestions; please come up with more of your own! Add to this list and spread the word.
Give this information to everyone you know and love.
Contact local first responders (EMTs, Paramedics, Fireman, etc). Tell them what is will be in the flu shots and that *they* will be the first ones to get it.
Contact local police and discuss concerns about mandatory vaccination. You go to church and to the grocery store with these folks and their kids play with your kids. They are not “scary” people. Take them coffee and a treat to get in the door.
Contact local city council members about your liberties. You need their support to maintain your right to refuse.
Write a small article for LOCAL, community newspapers. Watch for samples on http://www.drtenpenny.com
Have at least 3 weeks of food and water at your house and be prepared to voluntarily self-quarantine of given no other options.
Stock up on Vitamin D3 (3000 IU per person), Vitamin A, Vitamin C, etc and homeopathics for the flu
Connect with other activist organizations –those who support 2nd amendment issues, the environmental and animal rights. Help spread the word about their passion and get them involved with yours.You can’t do it all, but you can do something!* As stated years ago by Margaret Mead, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has.”
Mercury in vaccines has been known for a long time to cause health problems, but global awareness of how much of an impact it can have is growing rapidly. While many nations and organizations such as the UN push for the use of vaccines containing toxic compounds like mercury, other organizations such as the Coalition for Mercury-Free Drugs (CoMeD) is pushing for a ban.
The information on mercury in vaccines and pharmaceuticals was requested in March of this year for the meeting to take place in the fall. CoMeD was happy about this information, as they’ve been revealing information concerning the dangers of mercury at previous INC meetings.
Like the old saying goes, it’s a lot easier to stay out of trouble than it is to get our of trouble. Similarly, it is a whole lot safer and easier to avoid toxic compounds than it is to neutralize them or take them out of the body. However, there are certain measures to take if vaccinated. If you do receive a vaccine, the first thing to do is to get a cold ice pack and hold it on the infected area for up to 2 days. If the immune response does not subside, begin and continue to take cold showers. This will further help to block the immune reaction.
Another thing to do is to perform a heavy metal cleanse. A heavy metal cleanse will flush out the heavy metals and cause your body to be much less toxic. Although vaccines contain many heavy metals, they aren’t the only things to look out for when it comes to heavy metal toxicity. Silver fillings known as dental amalgams are also made up of mercury and can cause lots of problems. Mercury is also found in those environmentally friendly fluorescent bulbs. Mercury has even been found in high fructose corn syrup.
But the easiest thing to do is avoid mercury altogether. More people are refusing the flu shot and other vaccines this year as opposition grows worldwide. Each person can ‘be the one’ to urge organizations and governments to make serious changes in the healthcare system. As the opposition grows, the changes will come.
Please visit Natural Society for more great health news and vaccine information.
After all the accessible information available to the U.S. population on the dangers of vaccines, new survey data shows the message may not be getting through to the majority of people. Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults plan to be vaccinated against the flu this season.
Since the source of the survey comes from the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, the results may certainly be skewed, exaggerated or purposely and maliciously erroneous to convince the population of compliance. The opposite may be true. Recall a pollduring the 2009 H1N1 scare where 1,678 U.S. parents were interviewed by the University of Michigan‘s C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, and only 40% said they would get their children immunized against the H1N1 virus.
Back then, among those who said they did not intend to have their kids vaccinated against influenza, almost half — 46% — indicated they were not worried about their children becoming ill with the pandemic virus.
However, there is strong evidence from simple internet queries suggesting that many people still believe in the ridiculous notion that vaccines somehow prevent the flu.
William Schaffner, MD, and president of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases stated that “influenza vaccine remains the best prevention for the seasonal viral disease.”
As usual, statements from such foundations can be nothing further from the truth when it comes to the reality of flu shots. Since they always have an agenda, especially when sponsored by pharmaceutical giants, they can never be trusted to tell us the truth.
Since the pharmacokinetic properties of vaccines are not studied, vaccine manufacturers cannot deny any of the toxic effects of their ingredients. The reason they never analyze the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of these ingredients is because it would eradicate the vaccine industry. However the individual effects of each ingredient and their toxic effects on cells are well documented.
For example, most flu vaccines contain formaldehyde which is a known carcinogen. Many contain sterile agents such as Polysorbate 80. Other common immuntoxins and neurotoxins are sodium deoxycholate, thimerosal, oxtoxynol 10, MSG, neomycin sulfate, potassium chloride and polymyxin. The Goal of Every H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine: Immunotoxicity, Neurotoxicity and Sterility.
Anyone who had received five flu vaccinations has 10 times more chances to get affected with Alzheimer’s than if he/she got just one or two jabs, as stated by Hugh Fudenberg MD, world’s leading immunogeneticist.
“This is because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction”, said Fudenberg. So, he recommended that the flu shot had no much benefit so it was better to avoid them.
In one paper, international researchers analyzed all the data from patient studies on the flu vaccine performed worldwide in the last 37 years and discovered that vaccines showed at best a “modest” ability to prevent influenza or its complications in elderly people.
“The runaway 100 percent effectiveness that’s touted by proponents was nowhere to be seen,” said Tom Jefferson, a researcher in Rome with the Cochrane Vaccine Fields project, an international consortium of scientists who perform systematic reviews of research data.
The remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations and also noted that the vast majority of trials were inadequate.
The authors stated that the only ones showing benefit were industry-funded. They also pointed out that the industry-funded studies were more likely to be published in the most prestigious journals…and one more thing: They found cases of severe harm caused by the vaccines, in spite of inadequate reporting of adverse effects.
The study, “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults”, is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions, the drug testing industry and the medical system that relies on them.
To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate presents compelling evidence that vaccinating against any flu vaccine is simply a waste of time and hazardous to your health.
The Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex unveils the flawed predictive science used to publicize our health agencies’ influenza statistics and mortality rates and the corruption so prevalent at the CDC.
A Canadian-led study concluded that vaccinating nursing-home workers does nothing to cut the number of confirmed influenza cases among the homes’ elderly residents.
Vaccines Did Not Save Us! shows two centuries of official statistics proving conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.
Natural Infectious Disease Declines vs. Vaccination Effectiveness and Dangers major shows how declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed.
Five Myths to Keep in Mind About Flu Vaccines
Myth 1: The Flu Shot is very effective.
Statistically, you are less likely to get the flu if you haven’t had a flu vaccine. A BCTV reporter in Vancouver, commenting on the overload in BC emergency rooms, said that out of 32 people who had received a flu shot, 30 got the flu.
Myth 2: The Flu Shot has a high success rate.
This is a vaccine that only has a 6.25% success rate. This is a pretty big under-achievement, considering that the average reaction to placebo injections of distilled water is 30%.
Myth 3: The Flu Shot is safe.
Hugh Fudenberg MD, who is the world’s leading immunogeneticist, says that if a person had 5 flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 he/she is 10 times more likely to get Alzheimer’s Disease than if he/she had only one or two shots. Fudenberg said that this was because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction.
Myth 4: There are no harmful ingredients in vaccinations.
Flu vaccines consist primarily of 3 categories of ingredients. First there are viruses and cultured bacteria. The second ingredient is the way in which they can be cultivated. This includes aborted human fetal cells, chick embryos, pig blood, monkey kidney tissue, cowpox pus, and calf serum, and all of these foreign proteins get injected straight into your bloodstream. A bit repulsive just thinking about it, isn’t it? The flu shot also contains neutralizers, stabilizers, carrying agents and preservatives such as mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is something that is used for embalming the dead and is known to cause cancer. There is no amount of formaldehyde considered safe when injected into a living organism.
Myth 5: The Flu Shot works.
The flu shot could actually weaken your immune system and make you more likely to catch this virus. It has absolutely no value and should probably be avoided for your own safety. Not only is it loaded with toxic chemicals, but many people actually get the flu shortly after getting the shot, because it weakens their immune system instead of making it stronger like it is claimed to do
(NaturalNews) Following swine flu emergency declarations in 11 states, Washington D.C., American Samoa and the entire U.S. in 2009, hospitals around the country began implementing new flu vaccine mandates for their employees. Healthcare workers who worked for decades without getting vaccinated were suddenly faced with choosing between getting vaccinated and getting fired. Some had observed over the years that it was the vaccinated workers who most often took sick leave each winter to recover from flu-like illnesses. Nevertheless, since the so-called pandemic,[1] hospitals have increasingly been requiring vaccination for their employees. And the pro-vaccine rush hasn’t stopped there. In more recent months, entirely new categories of employees have been facing vaccine mandates, including airline employees, pharmacists, and hospital sales reps. Ultimately, all workers and adults will be in the sites of the rapidly advancing pharmaceutical vaccine agenda. Presently, immunization laws and policies for healthcare workers vary widely from state to state and from hospital to hospital. According to the CDC, some states have statutory vaccination requirements for healthcare employees, some have only recommendations, some have requirements and recommendations, and about 20 have no requirements or recommendation at all, leaving the matter entirely to hospital policy.[2] Of the 12 states that require one or more vaccines, only six offer a medical exemption, two offer medical and religious (Maryland and New Hampshire), and one offers medical, religious and philosophical (Maine). So, where employer-required vaccines are concerned, most healthcare workers are dealing with hospital policy only or a mixture of policy and state law. In the absence of applicable statutory exemption laws, hospital employees are left with indirect legal arguments to support the right to legally refuse vaccines in the workplace without penalty. Here’s an overview of one approach: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees covered by the Act on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.[3] With regard to religion, employers must reasonably accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs unless it would cause an undue hardship for the employer. (What potentially qualifies for a religious exemption is quite broad, but there are also legal pitfalls to avoid.)[4] However, since Title VII does not specifically mention healthcare employees and vaccines, we have to look to legal precedent to get a definitive legal answer to the question of whether or not — and if so, how — Title VII applies to this specific situation. Unfortunately, there appears to be no legal precedent on this specific point. So, we must assess the strength of the legal arguments for and against an employee’s right to refuse vaccines in the workplace for religious reasons under Title VII. For starters, don’t worry if you’re not a member of a church with tenets opposed to immunizations. First Amendment protection of the “free exercise” of religion is broad. Virtually anyone who is not an atheist can potentially qualify for a vaccine religious exemption. When assessing whether or not hospitals can “reasonably accommodate” their employees’ religious beliefs, we could examine the herd immunity theory (all are protected if most are immune) vs. the heightened infectious disease concerns in hospitals, but since there are hospitals around the country with Title VII policies allowing employees to refuse vaccines for religious reasons, this hospital environment debate may be a secondary concern. In fact, the federal government even recognizes a possible Title VII exemption for religious objections to pandemic vaccines during a declared pandemic.[5] So, if a hospital refuses to accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs by refusing all vaccine religious exemptions, period, they are confessing, in effect, that infectious disease is a greater concern for them than other hospitals that do allow Title VII exemptions. Of course, few if any hospitals would argue this as their reason for rejecting any and all employee religious exemptions. Perhaps there’s another reason… (Did I just hear someone say: “Follow the money”?) But there’s a more insidious aspect to this. Many hospital employees are “at will” employees. They can’t be fired for an unlawful reason, but they can be fired at any time for no reason. So, if a healthcare worker is denied an exemption and successfully sues their employer under Title VII, they may get their job back, but they may also be terminated shortly thereafter for “no reason”. The practical result is that some hospitals get away with violating their employees’ rights, because they can, and not because they have a good-faith legal argument favoring their pro-vaccine position. Employees whose employer takes a hard line “so sue me” position may not have much of a choice. Fortunately for now, the majority of hospitals appear to recognize a Title VII right for their employees to refuse vaccines for religious reasons, and most of my healthcare worker clients have been successful in refusing vaccines and keeping their jobs without facing the decision of whether or not to sue. As long as you avoid the legal pitfalls and your employer has a religious exemption policy, there’s a good chance of success. If your employer requires vaccines you wish to avoid, the first step is to find out what your employer’s exemption policy is. It’s best not to talk about your religion or religious beliefs before finding out what the policy is and what beliefs do and don’t qualify, legally, for religious exemptions. Unfortunately, this is an arena where a common sense approach can cost you the exemption; what many people think should qualify as a religious objection often doesn’t. For example, copied belief statements can be rejected as insincere, so copying from anti-vaccine websites is risky. These websites mean well, and I mean no disrespect, but they don’t understand the law. People have needlessly lost exemption rights by relying on anti-vaccine websites in the exercise of vaccine religious exemptions.[6] If your employer has an overly strict policy — e.g., requires membership in an organized religion or support from a religious leader — they are, arguably, overstepping their legal boundaries. You may need an attorney to explain your rights to your employer, to cite the legal precedent that supports your right without having to meet either of these requirements. If they have a lenient policy and ask only for a statement of your beliefs, that’s better, but you should still consider consulting an attorney to avoid the legal pitfalls, as this is one arena where your beliefs are likely to be closely scrutinized for flaws that would allow them to reject you. Disturbingly, some hospitals have even rejected a medical doctor’s recommendation that an employee not be vaccinated. The best long-term solution, then, may be for all concerned to become legislatively active. We need to educate our representatives about the true risks and failings of vaccines and the many better and safer means of addressing infectious disease concerns. We need new laws that allow informed choice, require transparency for all conflicts of interest, and that require prosecution of corruption. I’m happy to help activists anywhere in the U.S. with any pro-informed-choice vaccine legislative initiatives and with legal arguments against limitations on vaccine exemptions and adding more vaccine mandates. For a list of some of the legislative projects I’ve worked on so far, please see Vaccine Choice: Legislative Projects I’m also available to assist individuals with understanding and exercising their exemption rights wherever vaccines mandates are concerned in the U.S. ——————————– [1] We now know that the 2009-2010 Swine Flu Pandemic was a fake pandemic. For documented details, see the Swine Flu Review [2] http://www2a.cdc.gov/nip/StateVaccA… [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_… [4] According to federal legal precedent on vaccine religious exemptions, the First Amendment requires only a belief opposed to immunizations that is religious in nature and sincerely held. There are legal pitfalls as well, though, so employees serious about avoiding vaccines in the workplace for religious reasons should consider consulting an attorney experienced in this arena. If you are rejected due to a flawed religious beliefs statement, you may be in the difficult position of having to say, “Oops — what I meant to say was…”, with little chance of success. [5] May an employer covered by the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 compel all of it employees to take the influenza vaccine regardless of their medical conditions or their religious beliefs during a pandemic? http://answers.flu.gov/questions/4766 [6] Some people have been successful with school exemptions by copying from anti-vaccine websites, probably because some state exemption laws do not allow the state to scrutinize exemption claims. But in those states and federal contexts where beliefs can be scrutinized, copying can cost you the exemption. About the author: Alan Phillips, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3473 Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473 919-960-5172 Vaccine Rights: http://www.vaccinerights.com
Foreword by Neil Foster – The Sovereign Independent –
The article below is so full of holes and blatant lies that the Irish Independent should be prosecuted but there are no laws to state that the media has to tell the public the truth about anything so that’ll never happen. However, they should be prosecuted or at least taken to task the next time an Irish child suffers serious side effects such as autism or even death due to vaccination.
The ‘herd’ immunity theory is so bogus as to be laughable. Oh and by the way… We’re human beings, not CATTLE! Put simply, if I’m unvaccinated and my friend is unvaccinated and 80 % of our friends are vaccinated, then who is at risk? Through a simple calculation, that leaves 20%; my unvaccinated friend and myself. Do we care? NO because it was our informed choice, through our own independent research, not to become vaccinated. Therefore what have the other 80% of our friends got to worry about if the vaccines work?
The truth is that vaccines have never been proven to work and that every major disease eradicated and attributed to vaccines is a lie. These diseases were virtually eradictaed prior to mass vaccination campaigns. The historical record shows that absolute FACT! It also shows that the same diseases have been introduced on many occasions by the vaccines which were meant to prevent them. It also shows that most cases of these diseases are in VACCINATED memebers of the population.
I’m not going to put the links up here to make it easy for you. DO IT YOURSELF! START GETTING INTERESTED IN THE HEALTH OF YOUR CHILDREN!
Either that or you can trust a lying, thieving, parasitical and corrupt cabal of political puppets in the back pockets of the owners of Big Pharma corporations… THE WORLD BANKERS who continue to destroy your financial well being and who seek to destroy your health for profit and a depopulation agenda that is global!
Concern for children’s health as parents ignoring vaccines
By Edel Kennedy
Parents were yesterday warned to ensure their children get all of the jabs against potentially fatal diseases as figures show a drop in the uptake of vaccines.
The Health Service Executive said infants need five GP visits in the first 13 months of life for full immunisation — and if they fail to get the necessary booster shots then the early vaccines are worthless.
Dr Alf Nicholson, a paediatrician at Temple Street Hospital in Dublin, said that many parents are not getting their children vaccinated, despite the fact that they are free of charge.
This failure by parents means we are just below the numbers needed for herd immunity — meaning that if an outbreak occurs, it will spread rapidly amongst those who have not been immunised.
“We need a vaccination rate of about 90pc or 95pc for herd immunity,” he said. “But at the moment we’re at the 88pc or 89pc mark.
“About two years ago we had a major drop in the numbers getting the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine because people were concerned about the link between MMR and autism. But that’s been completely refuted and the numbers have gone back up. But they’re still not high enough.”
He said the problem was exacerbated by a very strong anti-vaccine lobby in the US and Europe — but each country was handling the problem in their own way.
“In Hungary vaccination is compulsory,” said Dr Nicholson. “And in France it’s linked to child welfare payments. So if you don’t have your child vaccinated your payments drop.”
Dr Brenda Corcoran, of the national immunisation office, said there has been a drop in numbers getting the Hib booster and third doses of PCV (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) and Men C vaccine, which protects against meningitis and septicaemia.
“We have seen a number of measles outbreaks in Ireland in recent years, which could have been prevented,” she said.
A new guide to childhood immunisation for parents has been launched to coincide with European Immunisation Week, which runs until Saturday.
A new immunisation tracker has also been launched to help parents keep track of their children’s vaccination history while also sending them timely reminders of when a further vaccination is due.
The tracker, which is available on irishhealth.com and iTunes, sends parents reminders when their child needs to be immunised, or needs a booster shot.
Protect
Among the vaccines given is one for tuberculosis (TB) at birth, a six-in-one shot, which must be given three times to protect against polio, whooping cough and other diseases; and the MMR vaccine, which is first given at 12 months.
Separately, the Meningitis Research Foundation (MRF) has also raised concerns over the drop in uptake of life-saving vaccines.
Young adults and children are most likely to carry the bacteria that cause meningitis — inflammation of the lining around the brain and spinal cord — and septicaemia, the blood poisoning form of the disease.
Up to 300 cases are recorded each year with one-in-10 patients dying. And 20pc of survivors are left with after-effects including brain damage, deafness, blindness and limb loss.
Clodagh Hegarty, medical information officer, said: “Many types of bacterial meningitis can be prevented through vaccination.
“It is vital that parents ensure their children are fully vaccinated against strains of meningitis and are also aware of the signs and symptoms of the diseases as this can save a life.”
[More children are killed now (35 UK 1990 est, with one media report mentioning 26 deaths) by the vaccine than would ever be killed by measles (around 1 under Allopathy), compounded by the fact measles is a safe disease under proper medical care such as use of vitamin C, while the Government spin doctors (aka liars) say it is safe and doesn’t kill (UK) even though families have been compensated for MMR deaths in the UK and the USA government admits it can kill. See the long running ‘Vaccines are Safe‘ lie. They have been getting away with this for over 150 years (see Smallpox vaccine deaths). See also: Media vaccine victim stories for some of the MMR damage such as autism.]
Deaths [Video] Something in the System When a child dies of measles the story hits the headlines. But when children die after the MMR jab, their stories are hard to find. Sarah Moore talks about the death of her daughter after the MMR jab and questions the legitimacy of results produced by the British Government.
[NVIC June 2006] Babies Die After MMR
Every day that government health officials lie to the people about vaccine risks is one more day that the public loses a little more trust in what they are told by government. …..MMR vaccine is known to induce brain inflammation and death within 8 to 14 days after vaccination……They and parents like them are standing up and coming forward to witness what has happened to their babies at the hands of pediatricians who told them that vaccines, including the MMR vaccine, are absolutely safe. The vaccine deaths of these babies might have been prevented if George and Anna’s parents had been given full and accurate information about MMR vaccine risk factors and pediatricians had erred on the side of caution rather than vaccinate at all costs. The rabid zeal to vaccinate, encouraged by government health officials, puts many vulnerable children at risk and the result is the brain damaging and killing of children like George and Anna.
[Media 1/2002 MMR deaths] Were all of these children killed by the triple MMR jab? In 1995 the Government’s vaccine damage tribunal paid £30,000 compensation to James Smith, of Gateshead, for brain damage after he was given MMR at the age of four. James died nine years later aged 13…..Judith Dwyer, received a payment after her four-year-old daughter Chloe died following a ‘booster’ jab of Urabe containing MMR in 1989. ‘Chloe first developed pins and needles in her legs, then paralysis and problems breathing. She was rushed to hospital but it was too late.’
MMR vaccine VAERS reports 7 deaths per year (1990-1994): “From July 1990 thro’ April 1994, 5799 ADRs following MMR vaccination were reported to US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS); including 3063 cases requiring emergency medical treatment, 616 hospitalisations, 309 who did not recover, 54 children left disabled and 30 deaths.”— John P Heptonstall
MMR Urabe: [See: MMR Pluserix & Immravax (Urabe).]
“Out of the 90 children on that list, 24 received a vaccine called Pluserix-MMR manufactured by SmithKline Beecham. It was withdrawn in the UK on the 14th September 1992 because of “reports of mild transient meningitis.” “Of the children that received Pluserix-MMR on that list, 3 died (1 after meningitis) , 4 had meningitis symptoms, 5 epilepsy, 5 had become autistic, 1 suffered from rheumatoid arthritis, 1 had severe urticaria and 2 had mumps. 6 had their speech affected – forgetting language skills they had acquired, 1 went deaf. 6 from this time suffered from delayed development and 4 were very very disturbed. One of the deaths was from the Guillain-Barré syndrome – where antibodies are produced that attack the body’s own cells . 7 or more suffered frequent fits or convulsions, 1 had terrible screaming fits. Thirteen of the children on that list received Immravax made by the French company, Merieux UK Ltd. This was also withdrawn on the same date and for the same reason as Pluserix-MMR – because of “reports of mild transient meningitis.”. Of the children that received Immravax; 6 became epileptic, 1 nearly died from encephalitis, 3 had meningitis, 1 measles and 1 mumps, 5 had speech and communication problems, 3 became slow developers, 7 had frequent fits and convulsions, 2 went into the kind of terrible screaming fits that are associated with brain trauma.”—Jani Roberts http://www.gn.apc.org/inquirer/jabs.html
Angelbabe43's Blog 