Angelbabe43's Blog

ITS ALL FOR LOVE

Posts Tagged ‘Infectious disease’

Lessons Not Learned: More Than 60% of Americans Still Plan On Getting Flu Vaccine

Posted by angelbabe43 on October 1, 2011

After all the accessible information available to the U.S. population on the dangers of vaccines, new survey data shows the message may not be getting through to the majority of people. Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults plan to be vaccinated against the flu this season.

Since the source of the survey comes from the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, the results may certainly be skewed, exaggerated or purposely and maliciously erroneous to convince the population of compliance. The opposite may be true. Recall a pollduring the 2009 H1N1 scare where 1,678 U.S. parents were interviewed by the University of Michigan‘s C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, and only 40% said they would get their children immunized against the H1N1 virus.

Back then, among those who said they did not intend to have their kids vaccinated against influenza, almost half — 46% — indicated they were not worried about their children becoming ill with the pandemic virus.

However, there is strong evidence from simple internet queries suggesting that many people still believe in the ridiculous notion that vaccines somehow prevent the flu.

William Schaffner, MD, and president of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases stated that “influenza vaccine remains the best prevention for the seasonal viral disease.”

As usual, statements from such foundations can be nothing further from the truth when it comes to the reality of flu shots. Since they always have an agenda, especially when sponsored by pharmaceutical giants, they can never be trusted to tell us the truth.

Since the pharmacokinetic properties of vaccines are not studied, vaccine manufacturers cannot deny any of the toxic effects of their ingredients. The reason they never analyze the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of these ingredients is because it would eradicate the vaccine industry. However the individual effects of each ingredient and their toxic effects on cells are well documented.

For example, most flu vaccines contain formaldehyde which is a known carcinogen. Many contain sterile agents such as Polysorbate 80. Other common immuntoxins and neurotoxins are sodium deoxycholate, thimerosal, oxtoxynol 10, MSG, neomycin sulfate, potassium chloride and polymyxin. The Goal of Every H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine: Immunotoxicity, Neurotoxicity and Sterility.

Anyone who had received five flu vaccinations has 10 times more chances to get affected with Alzheimer’s than if he/she got just one or two jabs, as stated by Hugh Fudenberg MD, world’s leading immunogeneticist.

“This is because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction”, said Fudenberg. So, he recommended that the flu shot had no much benefit so it was better to avoid them.

In one paper, international researchers analyzed all the data from patient studies on the flu vaccine performed worldwide in the last 37 years and discovered that vaccines showed at best a “modest” ability to prevent influenza or its complications in elderly people.

“The runaway 100 percent effectiveness that’s touted by proponents was nowhere to be seen,” said Tom Jefferson, a researcher in Rome with the Cochrane Vaccine Fields project, an international consortium of scientists who perform systematic reviews of research data.

The remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations and also noted that the vast majority of trials were inadequate.

The authors stated that the only ones showing benefit were industry-funded. They also pointed out that the industry-funded studies were more likely to be published in the most prestigious journals…and one more thing: They found cases of severe harm caused by the vaccines, in spite of inadequate reporting of adverse effects.

The study, “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults”, is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions, the drug testing industry and the medical system that relies on them.

To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate presents compelling evidence that vaccinating against any flu vaccine is simply a waste of time and hazardous to your health.

50 Reasons To Protect Infants From Vaccines shows several scientific arguments on why vaccines should never be given to children.

The Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex unveils the flawed predictive science used to publicize our health agencies’ influenza statistics and mortality rates and the corruption so prevalent at the CDC.

A Canadian-led study concluded that vaccinating nursing-home workers does nothing to cut the number of confirmed influenza cases among the homes’ elderly residents.

9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims shows why every vaccine is based on fradulent science and misinformed scientists.

Synergistic Toxicity: Study Shows That More Vaccines Are Linked To Higher Death Rates explains a study published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal which found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates.

Vaccines Did Not Save Us! shows two centuries of official statistics proving conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.

Natural Infectious Disease Declines vs. Vaccination Effectiveness and Dangers major shows how declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed.

Five Myths to Keep in Mind About Flu Vaccines

Myth 1: The Flu Shot is very effective.
Statistically, you are less likely to get the flu if you haven’t had a flu vaccine. A BCTV reporter in Vancouver, commenting on the overload in BC emergency rooms, said that out of 32 people who had received a flu shot, 30 got the flu.

Myth 2: The Flu Shot has a high success rate.
This is a vaccine that only has a 6.25% success rate. This is a pretty big under-achievement, considering that the average reaction to placebo injections of distilled water is 30%.

Myth 3: The Flu Shot is safe.
Hugh Fudenberg MD, who is the world’s leading immunogeneticist, says that if a person had 5 flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 he/she is 10 times more likely to get Alzheimer’s Disease than if he/she had only one or two shots. Fudenberg said that this was because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction.

Myth 4: There are no harmful ingredients in vaccinations.

Flu vaccines consist primarily of 3 categories of ingredients. First there are viruses and cultured bacteria. The second ingredient is the way in which they can be cultivated. This includes aborted human fetal cells, chick embryos, pig blood, monkey kidney tissue, cowpox pus, and calf serum, and all of these foreign proteins get injected straight into your bloodstream. A bit repulsive just thinking about it, isn’t it? The flu shot also contains neutralizers, stabilizers, carrying agents and preservatives such as mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is something that is used for embalming the dead and is known to cause cancer. There is no amount of formaldehyde considered safe when injected into a living organism.

Myth 5: The Flu Shot works.
The flu shot could actually weaken your immune system and make you more likely to catch this virus. It has absolutely no value and should probably be avoided for your own safety. Not only is it loaded with toxic chemicals, but many people actually get the flu shortly after getting the shot, because it weakens their immune system instead of making it stronger like it is claimed to do

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/080709_swine_flu_hype.shtml

Posted in DEPOPULATION, FLU VACCINE LIES, H1N1 HOAX, Population control, vaccine lies | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

How hospitals violate healthcare worker vaccine rights – with impunity

Posted by angelbabe43 on September 24, 2011

(NaturalNews) Following swine flu emergency declarations in 11 states, Washington D.C., American Samoa and the entire U.S. in 2009, hospitals around the country began implementing new flu vaccine mandates for their employees. Healthcare workers who worked for decades without getting vaccinated were suddenly faced with choosing between getting vaccinated and getting fired. Some had observed over the years that it was the vaccinated workers who most often took sick leave each winter to recover from flu-like illnesses. Nevertheless, since the so-called pandemic,[1] hospitals have increasingly been requiring vaccination for their employees. And the pro-vaccine rush hasn’t stopped there. In more recent months, entirely new categories of employees have been facing vaccine mandates, including airline employees, pharmacists, and hospital sales reps. Ultimately, all workers and adults will be in the sites of the rapidly advancing pharmaceutical vaccine agenda. Presently, immunization laws and policies for healthcare workers vary widely from state to state and from hospital to hospital. According to the CDC, some states have statutory vaccination requirements for healthcare employees, some have only recommendations, some have requirements and recommendations, and about 20 have no requirements or recommendation at all, leaving the matter entirely to hospital policy.[2] Of the 12 states that require one or more vaccines, only six offer a medical exemption, two offer medical and religious (Maryland and New Hampshire), and one offers medical, religious and philosophical (Maine). So, where employer-required vaccines are concerned, most healthcare workers are dealing with hospital policy only or a mixture of policy and state law. In the absence of applicable statutory exemption laws, hospital employees are left with indirect legal arguments to support the right to legally refuse vaccines in the workplace without penalty. Here’s an overview of one approach: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees covered by the Act on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.[3] With regard to religion, employers must reasonably accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs unless it would cause an undue hardship for the employer. (What potentially qualifies for a religious exemption is quite broad, but there are also legal pitfalls to avoid.)[4] However, since Title VII does not specifically mention healthcare employees and vaccines, we have to look to legal precedent to get a definitive legal answer to the question of whether or not — and if so, how — Title VII applies to this specific situation. Unfortunately, there appears to be no legal precedent on this specific point. So, we must assess the strength of the legal arguments for and against an employee’s right to refuse vaccines in the workplace for religious reasons under Title VII. For starters, don’t worry if you’re not a member of a church with tenets opposed to immunizations. First Amendment protection of the “free exercise” of religion is broad. Virtually anyone who is not an atheist can potentially qualify for a vaccine religious exemption. When assessing whether or not hospitals can “reasonably accommodate” their employees’ religious beliefs, we could examine the herd immunity theory (all are protected if most are immune) vs. the heightened infectious disease concerns in hospitals, but since there are hospitals around the country with Title VII policies allowing employees to refuse vaccines for religious reasons, this hospital environment debate may be a secondary concern. In fact, the federal government even recognizes a possible Title VII exemption for religious objections to pandemic vaccines during a declared pandemic.[5] So, if a hospital refuses to accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs by refusing all vaccine religious exemptions, period, they are confessing, in effect, that infectious disease is a greater concern for them than other hospitals that do allow Title VII exemptions. Of course, few if any hospitals would argue this as their reason for rejecting any and all employee religious exemptions. Perhaps there’s another reason… (Did I just hear someone say: “Follow the money”?) But there’s a more insidious aspect to this. Many hospital employees are “at will” employees. They can’t be fired for an unlawful reason, but they can be fired at any time for no reason. So, if a healthcare worker is denied an exemption and successfully sues their employer under Title VII, they may get their job back, but they may also be terminated shortly thereafter for “no reason”. The practical result is that some hospitals get away with violating their employees’ rights, because they can, and not because they have a good-faith legal argument favoring their pro-vaccine position. Employees whose employer takes a hard line “so sue me” position may not have much of a choice. Fortunately for now, the majority of hospitals appear to recognize a Title VII right for their employees to refuse vaccines for religious reasons, and most of my healthcare worker clients have been successful in refusing vaccines and keeping their jobs without facing the decision of whether or not to sue. As long as you avoid the legal pitfalls and your employer has a religious exemption policy, there’s a good chance of success. If your employer requires vaccines you wish to avoid, the first step is to find out what your employer’s exemption policy is. It’s best not to talk about your religion or religious beliefs before finding out what the policy is and what beliefs do and don’t qualify, legally, for religious exemptions. Unfortunately, this is an arena where a common sense approach can cost you the exemption; what many people think should qualify as a religious objection often doesn’t. For example, copied belief statements can be rejected as insincere, so copying from anti-vaccine websites is risky. These websites mean well, and I mean no disrespect, but they don’t understand the law. People have needlessly lost exemption rights by relying on anti-vaccine websites in the exercise of vaccine religious exemptions.[6] If your employer has an overly strict policy — e.g., requires membership in an organized religion or support from a religious leader — they are, arguably, overstepping their legal boundaries. You may need an attorney to explain your rights to your employer, to cite the legal precedent that supports your right without having to meet either of these requirements. If they have a lenient policy and ask only for a statement of your beliefs, that’s better, but you should still consider consulting an attorney to avoid the legal pitfalls, as this is one arena where your beliefs are likely to be closely scrutinized for flaws that would allow them to reject you. Disturbingly, some hospitals have even rejected a medical doctor’s recommendation that an employee not be vaccinated. The best long-term solution, then, may be for all concerned to become legislatively active. We need to educate our representatives about the true risks and failings of vaccines and the many better and safer means of addressing infectious disease concerns. We need new laws that allow informed choice, require transparency for all conflicts of interest, and that require prosecution of corruption. I’m happy to help activists anywhere in the U.S. with any pro-informed-choice vaccine legislative initiatives and with legal arguments against limitations on vaccine exemptions and adding more vaccine mandates. For a list of some of the legislative projects I’ve worked on so far, please see Vaccine Choice: Legislative Projects I’m also available to assist individuals with understanding and exercising their exemption rights wherever vaccines mandates are concerned in the U.S. ——————————– [1] We now know that the 2009-2010 Swine Flu Pandemic was a fake pandemic. For documented details, see the Swine Flu Review [2] http://www2a.cdc.gov/nip/StateVaccA… [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_… [4] According to federal legal precedent on vaccine religious exemptions, the First Amendment requires only a belief opposed to immunizations that is religious in nature and sincerely held. There are legal pitfalls as well, though, so employees serious about avoiding vaccines in the workplace for religious reasons should consider consulting an attorney experienced in this arena. If you are rejected due to a flawed religious beliefs statement, you may be in the difficult position of having to say, “Oops — what I meant to say was…”, with little chance of success. [5] May an employer covered by the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 compel all of it employees to take the influenza vaccine regardless of their medical conditions or their religious beliefs during a pandemic? http://answers.flu.gov/questions/4766 [6] Some people have been successful with school exemptions by copying from anti-vaccine websites, probably because some state exemption laws do not allow the state to scrutinize exemption claims. But in those states and federal contexts where beliefs can be scrutinized, copying can cost you the exemption. About the author: Alan Phillips, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3473 Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473 919-960-5172 Vaccine Rights: http://www.vaccinerights.com

Articles Related to This Article:

Facebook crowdsourced investigation exposes vaccine denials of SIGA Technologies

Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

Institute of Medicine adverse reactions report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems

Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine

NaturalNews exposes secret vaccine industry ties and military involvement with Institute of Medicine, reveals fatal conflicts of interest at IoM

7 reasons schools should NOT mandate vaccines

Posted in BIG PHARMA, Concpiracy, FLU VACCINE LIES | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »