Flu shot ingredients They include mercury and other highly toxic chemicals

It is quite disheartening that they are promoting the flu shot everywhere ,if you care at all about what is in it you would research and find out what they want to US TO PUT IN OUR BODIES…..the sad fact is they don’t care, plain and simple mass genocide please ,please ,please do you and your loved ones a favor and find out what is in it before you have it injected in your bloodstream!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

The list of flu shot ingredients is quite a long and scary one. But unlike, say, ingredients in canned and packaged foods, this list is not normally visible for consumers to see. People get flu shots from an injection given by the doctor. They do not first get to read the ingredients list.

If you do, you will certainly think more than twice about getting that flu shot. Because it is filled with toxic chemicals, some of which are extremely toxic.

Mercury in flu shots

Among the many toxic flu shot ingredients, the one that some consumers know about – and this is quite widely discussed on Internet forums – is mercury. Almost all flu shots, as well as other vaccines, contain Thimerosal, a mercury disinfectant / preservative.

Mercury is extremely toxic. It can cause brain injury and mercury in vaccines have been linked to an epidemic of autism, with the number of children affected by autism having risen by thousands of percent in the last two decades. Mercury can also cause auto immune diseases.

The medical establishment has been staunchly defending the use of mercury in flu shots and other vaccines because it simply cannot admit its dangers. To do so would be to admit that the entire medical profession has been harming people – in very serious ways – for over a hundred years. This could create a crisis of confidence in medical science, not to mention trillions of dollars in law suits.

What it has done is to:

• put warning labels on flu shots and other vaccines, which consumers do not get to read anyway.
• produce Thimerosal-free vaccines, but these are difficult to find. Only a small percentage of consumers know about the dangers of flu shot ingredients like Thimerosal and mercury, so there is not a lot of demand for Thimerosal-free vaccines and hence, not a lot of supply.

Meanwhile, health authorities like the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continue to refuse to warn the public against the dangers of flu shot ingredients like Thimerosal, citing “lack of evidence”.

Proponents of the flu shot and other vaccines argue that the amount of mercury present in flu shots is very small- about the amont found in a small can of tuna.

To begin with, nobody is saying that the amount of mercury in a can of tuna is harmless – especially for infants. It is just that the oceans have become so polluted that many people have come to accept that if they want to eat fish, they will inevitably have to take a bit of toxic mercury with it.

Moreover, the form of mercury used as flu shot ingredients is not the same as the type of mercury found in fish. The effects of mercury in vaccines are still not completely understood and nobody can say for sure that it is safe. All that the defenders of vaccination can say it is it is “not known to be harmful” – even though considerable scientific evidence already exists.

At the same time, health authorities are encouraging more people to get flu shots. in September 2008, the CDC expanded its recommendations to include yearly flu shots for all children ages 6 months to 18 years. The CDC also now advises pregnant women to be vaccinated, along with healthcare workers and those over 50.

So more and more people will get exposed to toxic flu shot ingredients like mercury. The problem will get worse!
What about Thimerosal-free vaccines?

Well, you still have a long list of other toxic flu shot ingredients to deal with. These include:

• Ethylene glycol is used as antifreeze. Ethylene glycol and its toxic byproducts first affect the central nervous system, then the heart and finally the kidneys. Ingestion of sufficient amounts can be fatal.
• Phenol, also known as carbolic acid, is used as a disinfectant and dye. Phenol was originally used as an antiseptic in surgery but it use was abandoned because it causes skin irritation. Before and during the Second World War, phenol injections were used by Nazi Germans as a means of rapid execution!
• Formaldehyde is the chemical used for embalming. It is used in vaccines as a perservative. Formadelhyde is a known cancer-causing agent and it can also cause allergic reactions. Its use in cosmetics is banned in Sweden and Japan.
• Aluminum is a toxic metal used as an additive in flu shots to promote antibody response. Aluminium is widely associated with Alzheimer’s disease and studies have shown that people who received five or more flu shots during a 10-year period has 10 times higher risks of developing Alzheimer’s Disease, compared to those who had fewer than two flu shots. Aluminuim has also been shown to cause seizures and cancer in laboratory mice.
• Antibiotics like Neomycin and Streptomycin are used as, well, antibiotics, They are added to flu shots to kill any bacteria that may be present. These antibiotics can cause allergic reaction in some people.

Finally, the vaccine…

After going through this long list of flu shot ingredients, do you still want to take it? We have not even come to the main ingredient – the vaccine itself, the supposedly weakened or disabled bacteria or virus that is supposed to stimulate the body’s immune response.

In the US, a typical flu shot contains three viruses, two A srains and one B strain. The choice of virus is decided by “experts” at the CDC, who make an educated guess as to which viruses are most likely to strike in a given year. If they guessed corectly, the vaccine might be about 70 percent effective. If they guessed wrongly, which they did in 2003/2004 winter, the effectiveness rate plunges to near zero!

How do they produce this virus that goes into flu shots? Or the bacteria that goes into other types of vaccines?

These are cultivated in animal proteins, such as rabbit brain tissue, monkey kidney tissue, pig blood, chicken embryo, embryonic guinea pig cells and calf serum. When injected into the body, these proteins turn toxic because proteins have to be broken down into amino acids by the digestive system before they can be utilised.

Click here to learn about the side effects of flu shot ingredients and the ineffectiveness of flu shots.

Related articles

• Lessons Not Learned: More Than 60% of Americans Still Plan On Getting Flu Vaccine (angelbabe43.wordpress.com)
• Flu Shots Contain More than 250 Times the EPA’s Safety Limit for Mercury (tipggita32.wordpress.com)
• Thimerosal in Vaccines (everydayhealth.com)
• Lessons Not Learned: More Than 60% of Americans Still Plan On Getting Flu Vaccine (worldtruthtoday.com)

http://www.vaclib.org/basic/fluindex.htm

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/ingredients.html

http://www.vaccinetruth.org/new_page_5.htm

http://www.uaff.info/flu_vaccine_news.htm

Lawsuit against FDA a success! Court rules censorship of two specific health claims unconstitutional

Image via Wikipedia

Tuesday, April 26, 2011 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff

(NaturalNews) A considerable legal victory has been achieved for the natural health community in defending freedom of health speech. A recent lawsuit filed by the Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) and several other plaintiffs against the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has successfully stopped the FDA from censoring the truth about the health benefits of both vitamin C and vitamin E. The case sets an important precedent for freedom of health speech as the court ruled that censorship of qualified health claims is unconstitutional.

Qualified health claims represent statements that make a connection between a particular substance and its ability to lower disease risk. Such statements can be found on juice containers, cereal boxes, and supplement bottles. One example of a qualified health claim is, “A diet rich in fruits and vegetables may reduce the risk of some types of cancer and other chronic diseases.”

The landmark 1999 case “Pearson vs. Shalala” established that food and supplement manufacturers are freely permitted to include qualified health claims on their products, so long as there is scientific evidence to back it up. And yet the FDA has fought tooth and nail to restrict the use of qualified health claims in almost every case, which is why ANH and others have repeatedly had to sue the FDA on the grounds that such restrictions are a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

In the recent case, the District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the FDA’s restriction of two specific claims concerning vitamin C and vitamin E, and their role in reducing the risk of cancer, was unconstitutional. The court ruled that the following two claims were permitted for use:

“Vitamin C may reduce the risk of gastric cancer.”

“Vitamin E may reduce the risk of bladder cancer.”

The FDA had tried to amend the two statements to basically assert that both vitamins play no significant role in cancer prevention. This assessment, of course, is ludicrous when considering that numerous studies have identified a clear link between vitamins C and E, and a reduced risk of cancer (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/conten…).

Having to individually fight the FDA on each and every health claim for a vitamin, mineral, or nutrient, is not only a huge waste of time and money, but it is also unnecessary. After all, the Constitution already guarantees freedom of speech, which includes freedom of health speech. Nevertheless, ANH is urging the public to garner support for the “Free Speech About Science Act,” which will finally put an end to all FDA tyranny against freedom of health speech (http://www.naturalnews.com/032062_f…).

To contact your representatives and urge support for the Free Speech About Science Act, visit:
http://www.anh-usa.org/free-speech-…

Sources for this story include:

http://www.anh-usa.org/anh-usa-wins…

Articles Related to This Article:

• Where’s the health in health care reform?

• The inside scoop: Natural Health Products Expo West industry event

• Review of Google Health – Technology Achievement or Privacy Disaster?

• The Honest Food Guide empowers consumers with independent information about foods and health

• The Politics of National Health Care Reform: Why no Popular Presidential Candidate can Solve Our Health Care Crisis (transcript)

• Shattering the false philosophy and junk science of conventional medicine

Related Articles

• The wonderfully Orwellian Free Speech About Science Act of 2011 (H.R. 1364) [Respectful Insolence] (scienceblogs.com)
• FDA Leaves You On Your Own to Figure Things Out (livingdreamteam.com)
• Armed agents invade Maxam Nutraceutics and steal natural health products in shocking FDA raid (montrosecommunitypress.wordpress.com)

The Importance of Getting Factual Information on Vaccinations

By Catherine J. Frompovich | March 27th, 2011

Early in March 2011, the world was traumatized by a series of most devastating events in Japan. An earthquake registering 9 on the Richter scale, followed by an almost eighty- foot-high tsunami in some areas, washed inland destroying untold thousands of lives, entire towns and villages, while breaching several nuclear power plant reactors that continue to contaminate the globe with deadly radiation that poisons food and water sources, may ruin the Japanese economy, and cause untold suffering from cancer.

Sadly, information about the amounts of radiation spreading across the Pacific Ocean into the western United States is being downplayed because governments either are afraid of causing panic or really don’t know what to do. To quote a familiar phrase, “Houston, we’ve got a problem.”

However, various media reports tell how either misinformation or lack of information seemed to be standard operating procedures for Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), operators of the damaged nuclear power plants even before the March 11 earthquake. More recently, the saddest of all was to hear that TEPCO apparently was not forthcoming about how much radiation was in the facilities’ water and two workers, who were valiantly trying to contain the accident, suffered radiation burns to their feet and legs and had to be hospitalized for those burns. TEPCO and Japanese government officials subsequently apologized for not informing workers about water radiation levels that exceeded ‘safe’ levels. What good is an apology when, deliberately going into a situation from the very beginning, factual information was withheld that could have made a difference or prevented those brave workers exposure?

The above horror is only too familiar a scenario when corporate interests come before human interests, regardless of the industry involved. A most interesting aspect, though, occurs when ‘sudden’ and dramatic harm happens, as with the tsunami, and officials ‘wonder’ why when all along misinformation was being presented about safety standards as to how TEPCO’s nuke plants could survive the harshest of natural accidents.

The Japan nuclear incident presents a parallel situation that correlates with health issues, in my opinion. That issue, I say, is the pseudo-science and pharmaceutical spin regarding vaccines and their ‘safety and effectiveness’ plus the media’s apparent collusion promoting that misinformation; a real health-tsunami in the making, if ever there was one.

Probably nothing supports that dramatic claim more than what has become known as the Simpsonwood Report. Here’s a brief overview of what happened:

In June 2000, a top-secret meeting of health officials and government scientists occurred at the secluded Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia. Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened the meeting, no public announcement was made of the gathering. Just 52 private invitations were issued. Participants included high-level officials from the CDC, FDA, top vaccine specialists from the World Health Organization, and representatives from every major vaccine manufacturer, including Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the participants were repeatedly warned that the scientific data under discussion was “embargoed.” Note-taking and photocopies of documents were strictly prohibited. No papers could leave the room.

The federal health officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss an alarming new study that confirmed a link between thimerosal (mercury) in childhood vaccines and neurological damage, including recent dramatic increases in autistic spectrum disorders. Tom Verstraeten, a CDC epidemiologist, had analyzed the agency’s massive Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database (distinct from VAERS) containing thousands of medical records of vaccinated children and was “stunned” by what he saw:“We have found statistically significant relationships between exposure [to mercury in vaccines] and outcomes. At two months of age, developmental delay; exposure at three months, tics; at six months, attention deficit disorder. Exposure at one, three and six months, language and speech delays—the entire category of  neurodevelopmental delays.” Verstraeten also discussed previous studies showing a link between mercury and neurodevelopmental disorders. Since 1991, when the CDC and FDA started requiring newborn infants to receive multiple doses of thimerosal-laced hepatitis B vaccines, thimerosal-laced haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccines, and the already mandated thimerosal-laced diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis shots (via DPT and DTaP), cases of autism skyrocketed.

Dr. Bill Weil, with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), told the group, “You can play with this all you want,” but the results “are statistically significant.” Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician, exclaimed, “I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on.” Yet, instead of taking quick action to warn parents and recall the unsafe shots, this shameless group of 52 vaccine proponents spent the next two days calculating how to cover up the truth. “We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits,” said Dr. Robert Brent, a pediatrician. However, Dr. Robert Chen, head of vaccine safety for the CDC, congratulated his group for their apparent success thus far at concealing the facts, and expressed relief that “given the sensitivity of the information, we have been able to keep it out of the hands of, let’s say, less responsible hands.”

Dr. John Clements, WHO vaccine advisor, was more blunt, declaring that perhaps the CDC study “should not have been done at all because the outcome could have, to some extent, been predicted.” He stated that “the research results have to be handled,” and warned that the study “will be taken by others and used in ways beyond the control of this group.”

How to “handle” undesirable scientific data:
At the Simpsonwood gathering, a plot was hatched. To begin, the CDC relinquished control of its vast database on childhood vaccines—the very same database Tom Verstraeten used to confirm a link between thimerosal-laced vaccines and autism. Although the VSD database was public property—developed at taxpayer expense—it was turned over to a private health insurance agency, ensuring that it could not be accessed by non-collaborators for additional research. Three years later, Verstraeten had reworked the data and published a new version of his original study in the November 2003 issue of Pediatrics. However, this time “no consistent significant associations were found between thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes.” [Dr. Mark Geier, an independent scientist, eventually gained access to the VSD data. His findings were published in a recent issue of the Journal of the Neurological Sciences.]

After the Simpsonwood gathering, the CDC also instructed the Institute of Medicine (IOM), i.e., the National Academy of Sciences, to produce a new study with contrived results: no correlation between thimerosal and brain disorders. According to Dr. Marie McCormick, who chaired the IOM’s Immunization Safety Review Committee in January 2001, the CDC “wants us to declare, well, that these things are pretty safe.” In fact, “we are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect” of thimerosal. In transcripts of the meeting, the committee’s chief staffer, Kathleen Stratton, predicted that the IOM would conclude that the evidence was “inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation” between thimerosal and autism. Apparently, that was what “Walt wants”—a reference to Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the CDC’s National Immunization Program.

To complete the deception, the CDC would need additional “proof” that thimerosal-laced vaccines are safe. They never intended to conduct honest science; rather, their goal was to establish a plausible defense, insulate manufacturers against liability, while producing justification for continuing mandatory vaccine campaigns. For example, in May 2001, Dr. Gordon Douglas, then-director of strategic planning for vaccine research at the National Institutes of Health, assured a Princeton University gathering that “four current studies are taking place to rule out the proposed link between autism and thimerosal.” Furthermore, “in order to undo the harmful effects of research claiming to link the [measles] vaccine to an elevated risk of autism, we need to conduct and publicize additional studies to assure parents of safety.” Douglas formerly served as president of vaccinations for Merck.

The Simpsonwood gathering places all CDC-sponsored research into question. Although this civic institution was originally entrusted with a lofty mandate to protect our children, it has degenerated into a private arm of the pharmaceutical industry. The CDC has lost its ethical bearings and cannot be trusted to objectively oversee scientific studies whose outcomes affect the health and welfare of our youngest, most innocent members of society. Who is looking after our children—the brain-trust of our future—if policy trumps science, and profits trump safety? “The CDC is guilty of incompetence and gross negligence” says Mark Blaxill, vice president of Safe Minds, a nonprofit organization concerned about mercury in medicines. “The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It’s bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you’ve ever seen.” [Emphasis added]

Source: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=188274776746

The above information was excerpted from Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Z. Miller. Original sources are fully referenced in the book. This information also appears in Vaccines & Vaccinations: The Need for Congressional Investigation along with hundreds of other examples with documenting links, research, and science supporting how misinformation is being perpetrated upon unsuspecting health consumers and their children, in particular. Additionally, there’s an apparent pharmaceutical industry spin to rewrite chemistry regarding toxic substances like mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, etc. as being ‘safe and effective’—something that resonates similarly to TEPCO’s claim that its nuke plants could withstand any natural disaster only to realize that Japan may never be the same as a result of that misinformation.

Thus the importance of getting factual information, something the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is in collaboration with Big Pharma apparently to prevent, I contend from thirty-five years of researching consumer health issues. Medical science has been hijacked and made into a legal prostitute plying its toxic wares without any oversight from Congress; no challenge from an inquisitive media; and an apparent concerted effort to subjugate everyone under a pharmaceutical-industry-induced medical inquisition, I contend. That has to be reined in—and very soon.

Consumers, taxpayers, citizens—all—must take back the sovereignty of our bodies, lives, children, and health as there’s a tsunami coming. To give you an analogy, the tide has pulled out; the shoreline is devoid of water and awaiting the final rush of devastation that will come with mandated vaccinations or imprisonment. Not vaccinated, you will be a threat to society. Maybe those who refuse vaccinations will be declared ‘health terrorists’ or ‘homeland security threats’. Think that’s impossible? There are many presidential executive orders that negate the U.S. Constitution and your personal rights.

For example: “EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency [FEMA] to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA’s Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA’s role as a “new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.” (http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1062)

Nothing is more important to Big Pharma corporate governance than all their moneymaking vaccines with neurotoxins and other poisons that, incidentally, the U.S. Congress should be investigating and not caving in to Big Pharma’s pseudo-science and ‘herd protectionism’ marketing philosophy.

Two states, Washington and West Virginia, recently passed legislation that medical exemptions no longer apply there. The tsunami is washing ashore.

Related Articles

• The emergence of Vaccine induced Diseases (worldtruthtoday.com)
• Did CDC Conspire to Hide Vaccine Risk? (children.webmd.com)
• Multiple studies link autism to mercury, which is still present in most flu vaccines (truthonmedecine.wordpress.com)
• False Foundations of Science: Can Vaccine Studies Be Trusted? (truthonmedecine.wordpress.com)
• Vaccine Resistance Movement Launches Worldwide Autism Study (anatavar.wordpress.com)

Fluoridation: The scam of the century

(NaturalNews) This scam starts as follows: the CDC (Centers For Deceit Control and Procrastination) in their Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of August 17, 2001/Vol 50/ No. RR-14 entitled “Recommendations for Using Fluoride to Prevent and Control Dental Caries in the United States, says on page 4, 5th paragraph, “that fluoride’s predominant effect is after the tooth comes into the mouth and on the surface of the tooth”.

The question posed to the CDC, the EPA, and the Public Health officials of “why then do we have to ingest it?” NEVER gets answered. 

Then there’s the issue of INFORMED CONSENT. Every doctor knows that they can’t force any medication on an individual without their informed consent. The doctor has to tell the patient of the benefits and of any side effects of a prescribed medication. This puts the final decision to take or not take the medication in the hands of the patient. In addition, the patient has the right to question any treatment so as to make a better decision.

Fluoridation clearly violates this principle.

One of the arguments presented by those that push this crap is to say that no one is forced to drink the water. Yes, the fluoride comes to the tap but ultimately it’s the individual’s choice to open the tap and drink the water. Please stop laughing. This is their serious argument.

Another argument is that fluoride is not a drug but rather it is a nutrient. So when the question of since when is the toxic waste by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry or the aluminum or steel industry a nutrient? They usually look at their watches and tell you that they hear their mother calling them and they have to go.

If it is indeed a nutrient why then do the CDC and the ADA (American Dimwit Association), the major pushers of fluoridation in the U.S., say that tooth decay is a “chronic infectious disease” and recommend fluoride to combat this disease? And why does the Fraud and Drug Administration call fluoride an “unapproved” drug? What a classic example of blatant hypocrisy and the anything goes mentality to make money for the pimp.

Earl Baldwin, a member of the British House of Lords and one of the advisory board members for the York Review, the UK sponsored review of fluoridation had this to say: “What physician do you know, who in his or her right mind, would treat someone he does not know and has never met, with a substance that’s meant to do change in their bodies, with the advice: ‘Take as much, or as little, as you like, but take it for a lifetime because it may help someone’s teeth’?”

With fluoridation there is no control over who gets the “medication” or the dosage. What if someone is particularly sensitive to the substance? Tough! What if you’re an athlete and drink a gallon of water a day? Tough!

When a person consumes a medication, say aspirin for example, isn’t the dose for an infant or a child different that that for an adult? Obviously. With fluoride it’s a one-fits-all mentality.

Let’s say for a moment that the ingestion of fluoride is a good thing. Who gets more? Your body or your dishes when you wash them, your car when you wash it, your lawn when you water it, or the environment when you flush the toilet? You answer that one and then let me know if mandated fluoridation is a good thing or a bad thing.

Should you raise the issue of reduced tooth decay it has already be proven and documented that those living in unfluoridated communities have virtually the same rates of tooth decay as those living in fluoridated communities. But, there is one profound difference: those living in fluoridated communities have a much, much greater risk of dental fluorosis, which is symptomatic of the discoloration and eventual mottling of the teeth leading to a lifetime of cosmetic veneers or living with the disfiguration.

As if ruining your teeth isn’t enough there has been credible documentation showing other debilitating effects. Dr. Phyllis Mullenix proved that fluoride had an adverse effect on the brain. As a result she was told that her work “was no longer relevant to dentistry” and fired. Peer-reviewed studies showing adverse effects on the thyroid gland were ignored as were studies linking fluoride to damage of the pineal gland. The pineal gland is located between the two hemispheres of the brain and is responsible for the synthesis and secretion of melatonin. Melatonin affects jet lag, sleep patterns and aging and by the time old age hits, the accumulation of fluoride in the pineal gland is in very high concentrations.

But wait, there’s more. There is also a profound connection between fluoride and bone damage. With symptoms almost identical to arthritis beginning with aching bones and joints. But the best cover-up had to come out of Harvard University. Elise Bassin, as part of her 2001 doctoral thesis for her dental degree, found a connection between fluoride and bone cancer in adolescent boys. When she submitted her finding to Dr. Chester Douglas, the head of Harvard’s Dental School, he omitted that finding when releasing her thesis. Why would he do this? Maybe the fact that he was on the payroll of the Colgate-Palmolive Company had something to do with it. Somehow, years later, Bassin’s finding were found and released causing Harvard to do a complete investigation on Dr. Douglas. During the investigation Dr. Douglas made a $2 million donation to Harvard and was eventually exonerated.

One other finding was an adverse effect on the kidneys. It was found that fluoride can damage the kidneys at high levels and that someone with poor kidney function would have limitations clearing fluoride from the body making that person especially vulnerable to fluoride’s other toxic effects.

With all this adversity is there any group, organization or government agency accepting any responsibility? No, No, No! One would think that of the entities heavily involved in fluoridation someone would take charge or accept liability. The American Dental Association does not. The CDC does not. The EPA does not. The FDA does not. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services does not. The National Sanitation Foundation does not. Yet, all these government agencies pass the buck to the National Sanitation Foundation who in turn accepts no liability for the safe levels or the safety of the chemicals it recommends. Pimps, hookers and tricks!

So what started out as an experimental program in 1945, without any health studies done whatsoever, turned out to be a “cash cow” for industries that previously had to dispose of this toxic waste to the tune of millions of dollars a year.

There is a book out there entitled, Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. The Precautionary Principle means that if there is uncertainty, yet credible scientific evidence or concern of threats to health, precautionary measures should be taken.

Applying the Precautionary Principle to fluoridation the following questions and answers arise:

1. Is the risk of harm plausible? Yes.
2. Is the evidence of harm supported by a number of peer-reviewed published studies? Yes.
3. Is the potential harm serious? Yes.
4. Are the effects reversible? Many are not.
5. Is the public being fully informed of the potential health risks? No.
6. Does the proposed intervention achieve the desired benefit? No.
7. How significant are the consequences if the practice is halted? Not very.
8. Are there alternatives? Yes.

Joel Tickner and Melissa Coffin, two scientists that examined the water fluoridation controversy in the context of The Precautionary Principle, raised the following questions in the March 2006 issue of the Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice.

*Whether there are other ways of delivering fluoride besides the water supply.
*Whether fluoride needs to be swallowed to prevent tooth decay.
*Whether tooth decay has dropped at the same rate in countries with and without water fluoridation.
*Whether people are now receiving fluoride from many other sources besides the water supply.
*Whether studies indicate fluoride’s potential to cause a range of adverse systemic health effects.
*Whether, since fluoridation affects so many people, one might accept a lower level of proof before taking preventative actions.

It should be noted that even if you are not living in a fluoridated community you are ingesting fluoride. When you eat foods and drink beverages that are not produced in your community you are likely ingesting substances that were produced with fluoridated water.

Despite the recommended ingestion of fluoride at 1.2 ppm, the reality is that people are ingesting fluoride at at least 8 ppm.

To solve the issue of tooth decay the proponents of fluoridation say more fluoride is necessary. The opponents of fluoridation say that more education is necessary. Education is needed about better diets, better dental habits and the dangers of sugar in relation to the teeth.

People with open minds need to get involved. Letters to Editors need to be written. City and state politicians need to be inundated with requests to discontinue the practice of water fluoridation. Pressure of non-reelection needs to be thrust upon them if they do not introduce bills to discontinue the practice.

Remember there are more tricks than pimps and hookers and we need to solidify to end this health damaging practice. The life you save and the health you restore may be your own.

Aloha!

References:
J.A. Yiamouyiannis, “Water Fluoridation and Tooth Decay”
Paul Connett, PhD, “The Case Against Fluoride”
Chris Bryson, “The Fluoride Deception”

About the author:
I have been doing a weekly radio show in Honolulu since 1981 called “Health Talk”. In 2007 I was “forced” to get a Masters degree in Nutrition because of all the doctors that would call in asking for my credentials. They do not call in anymore. Going to www.healthtalkhawaii.com enables you, among other things, to listen to the shows. I am an activist. In addition to espousing an organic vegan diet for optimum health, I am strongly opposed to GMOs, vaccines, processed foods, MSG, aspartame, fluoridation and everything else that the pimps (Big Pharma, Monsanto and the large food companies) and the hookers (the doctors, the government agencies, and the public health officials) thrust upon us, the tricks.
After being vaccinated with the MMS vaccine as a toddler I developed asthma. After taking the organic sulfur crystals in November of 2008 for 10 days my asthma reversed and has not come back over 2 years later. You can find out more about this incredible nutrient also on my website.
I am 72. I have been a vegetarian for 36 years and a vegan for 21. I have no illnesses and take no meds. I play basketball 2 hours a week, am in 2 softball leagues, racewalk, body surf, do weight workouts and teach women’s self defense classes based upon 25 years of Wing Chun training.
My firm belief – if it had a face and a mother or if man made it, don’t eat it.
Aloha!

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031335_water_fluoridation.html#ixzz1E1YMFGtn

Related posts:

1. Fluoride unsafe for bottle-feeding infants!
2. Water Fluoridation and Hip Fracture
3. Fluoridation and irritable bowel syndrome
4. The Fluoride Deception
5. Fluoridation and Bone Cancer

Short URL: http://oneworldscam.com/?p=12716

Related Articles

• Fluoridation: The scam of the century. (inmatezero.wordpress.com)

Someone stopped by and gave me this link that people can download and copy and give to everyone to wake them all up, Fluoride as you might not know is RAT POISON and even Hitler used it in his camps.Thank you Tim for this and on we go to wake up the MASSES…..and yes I know they put it in our water ,toothpaste I have switched too non fluoride tooth paste in my home Toms of Maine has a natural non fluoride that my son and I use..

http://www.maebrussell.com/

http://www.fluoridealert.org/

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=14903

Here’s a artical of a Fluoride spill at a water Facility very interesting and they feed us this toxic stuff….

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=17114

Fluoride means lower IQs and more mental retardation

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=15680

Fluoride in water a health hazard

Fluoride is a waste by-product of the fertiliser and aluminium and phosphate industry and is a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972. The fluoride agent used in this state is a fertiliser waste product imported from a fertiliser factory in Holland, where fluoridation is banned by law. It also contains arsenic, mercury, lead and chromium.

http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=15331

http://vactruth.com/2011/03/10/fluoride-how-wrong-can-health-agencies-be/

Seventy million expired flu vaccines about to be incinerated as waste

H1N1 IS A HOAX FOLKS BECAUSE INFACT IT IS A FORM OF DEPOPULATION BECAUSE APPARENTLY THERE IS TOO MANY OF US COMMON PEOPLE THEY(Globalists including Bill Gates) You can call them The Illuminati/New World Order or whatever you like they all work for the same cause and they could give a hoot about any of Us…..

(NaturalNews) Forty million doses of H1N1 swine flu vaccine are about to go up in flames, and another 30 million will soon meet the same fate. They’ve expired, you see, and despite the CDC‘s best efforts to push flu vaccines on the American people, the industry still couldn’t find a way to offload seventy million doses of a vaccine that doesn’t even work. So crank up the inciner

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

ators! When it comes to flu vaccines in the USA, it turns out we all got burned.

I could have told you this was coming. Actually, myself and a long list of other natural health authors, doctors and independent journalists did tell you this was coming. We warned over a year ago that the swine flu pandemic was a hoax, and that the CDC and WHO were fanning the flames of a this false pandemic in order to increase demand for H1N1 vaccines that would inflate the profits of their corporate masters (the drug companies).

What we didn’t know at the time was how deep the corruption at the CDC and WHO really goes. It turns out that key advisors in both organizations were on the take from Big Pharma, collecting cash payments even as they pushed for a global declaration of a pandemic that never appeared. This was more than a mere statistical error or “guessing on the safe side” — this was a planned conspiracy to create demand for vaccines by scaring the public into taking a drug that the industry already knows doesn’t even work. The WHO still won’t release the names of the discredit scientists who urged it to declare a stage six pandemic.

Why the secrecy? Because the WHO doesn’t want journalists looking into the financial ties between its advisors and the drug companies. And that’s because they’re all on the take. This entire charade was nothing more than pseudoscientific orgy of profit orchestrated to exploit the fears and health ignorance of the population for the sole purpose of generating money for powerful corporations.

Street hustlers of the health world

And it worked. World governments spent billions of dollars on H1N1 flu vaccines, many of which now need to be incinerated at additional taxpayer cost. The magnitude of theft of public dollars that took place under this H1N1 fiasco is simply staggering. This was one of the greatest public health swindles ever pulled off.

In all, we’re talking about close to half a billion dollars in public money that has been utterly wasted on flu vaccines that never even worked in the first place.

Yes, you read that right: Flu vaccines don’t work. Not a shred of evidence exists that they work any better than placebo. In fact, all the available evidence that I’ve been able to find shows that the H1N1 flu vaccine was never even scientifically tested in a legitimate clinical trial.

Nevertheless, the U.S. government spent nearly half a billion dollars on these quack vaccines — money that’s now going up in flames, wasted on yet another public health scam but at the same time fattening the wallets of the Big Pharma CEOs and shareholders who profited handsomely from this charade.

You have to admit, it was a clever hustle. Street magic hustlers couldn’t have done it any better: The CDC, WHO, drug companies and mainstream media pulled off their multi-billion-dollar scam with stunning effectiveness. The news was shaped, the statistics were distorted (or outright made up and then called “official”), the science hallucinations were properly marketed to health professionals, and levels of fear were stoked into a raging fury that led to mindless purchases of useless vaccines that are now utterly worthless. Actually they’re worse than worthless: They are a liability where money must now be spent to dispose of them.

The whole scam was downright brilliant… in an evil sort of way. And still today, the health authorities who pulled this off claim they did nothing wrong! They insist they all acted in your interests even though the only parties who benefitted from their actions were the drug companies who profited from the vaccine scheme. Meanwhile, you and all your tax-paying neighbors will ultimately foot the bill for this.

Bend over again

But don’t put away your checkbook just yet: The vaccine industry plans to pull off the very same scam this coming Fall. It worked once already, right? Why not gouge the public again?

Get ready for another big season of quack vaccine science, influenza scare stories and arrogant health officials urging everybody to go get vaccinated as soon as possible. And during all this, they won’t dare tell you about vitamin D, or immune boosting herbs, or sunlight therapy or anything that can actually improve your health for free (or nearly free). Instead, they want you to keep playing their “vaccine sucker” game where you pony up twenty bucks to get jabbed in the arm with a drug they already know won’t really help you at all.

There’s more to this story

If you want to know just how deep the rabbit hole goes with this story, read this shocking article on flu vaccine fraud by Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null: http://www.naturalnews.com/029124_f…

It reveals things about the vaccine industry that you never could have imagined — things like the financial payoffs, the secret experts who decide when to issue a pandemic alert, the science that proves flu vaccines don’t work, the failure of the vaccine industry to reveal the real results of their clinical trials, and much more.

It is a truly shocking (and disturbing) story about what really goes on in the vaccine industry. Click the story link here to read it for yourself: http://www.naturalnews.com/029124_f…

Sources for this story include:
CNS News: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/68848{SubscribeHealthRangerBlock}

Articles Related to This Article:

• The inside scoop: Natural Health Products Expo West industry event

• NaturalNews emerges as top truly independent natural health news site

• NaturalNews readers making waves across the natural health, natural living markets (opinion) __________________

http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2678695

http://www.naturalnews.com/031172_vaccines_children.html

Related Articles

• WHO blames drug industry for swine flu vaccine delay (reuters.com)
• CDC: Flu Vaccine Arriving, Get Yours ASAP (webmd.com)
• Key Facts About Swine Influenza (everydayhealth.com)