Angelbabe43's Blog

ITS ALL FOR LOVE

Archive for the ‘Population control’ Category

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination

Posted by angelbabe43 on October 13, 2011

Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to please download and re-post this video to every website possible. Make DVDs and place your activist group name on the menu. Edit pieces and Rickroll YouTube with vaccine truth! This is public domain, and no permission is needed to copy, reproduce, and give away this video and information.

Clint Richardson

http://healthcaretyranny.com/

Posted in DEPOPULATION, Population control, vaccine, vaccine lies, VACCINE SCAMS, vaccines | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

April Boden Uncovers Big Pharma’s Plan to Destroy California’s Children

Posted by angelbabe43 on October 13, 2011

by Liam Scheff

for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News Radio

On Tuesday’s Robert Scott Bell Show (10-10-11) April Boden, vaccine activist, blogger and mother of a vaccine-damaged six-year-old in California, reveals her deeply insightful take on the politics of the two – count them, two – vaccine bills, that were just passed by Governor Jerry “Drug-Fever” Brown.

According to April (http://aydansrecovery.blogspot.com), “The whole thing was entirely calculated. On one hand you have bill AB499 which allows a minor to consent to vaccines without parental knowledge, on the other you have SB946 which is about autism insurance reform.”

These two bills were put to Governor Brown for approval on the same day, a crass calculation says April, as they pit one and the same group of activists – those concerned or mortified by vaccine damages – against each other. The first bill, AB499, allows students in public schools – and minors all over the pharma-crazed State of California – to be given drugs for any presumed sexually transmitted disease, including the Gardasil vaccine injection.

But is HPV truly an STD? It occurs in some 80 percent of the human population. It is a harmless wart virus that does not – I repeat – does not “cause cervical cancer,” despite what the pharma propaganda machine tells the sleep-walking public. According to even the mainstream’s statistics, close to 99 percent of women who ever have the ‘virus,’ never get the disease! How’s that for ‘proof of causation?’

The reality is this: HPV is an entirely common nothing of a virus, which like most “viruses” is expressed under cellular stress, and which is suppressed or made completely inactive in a healthy, well-regulated cell.

Cells which are nurtured and fed essential nutrients, like essential fatty acids, selenium and glutathione regularly stop the expression of “viruses.” Cells which are dysregulated, starved for nutrients and intoxicated by chemicals, pesticides, heavy metals and neurotoxins often express viruses. We encourage viral expression in bodies which are starved and abused. And let’s stop to note that the very chemicals and agents which damage cells are precisely those which constitute vaccines!

But the once “hippy” Governor isn’t interested in nutrition, or cellular health, or even that long-forgotten concept of “choice” that Liberals claim to care for with such passion. No, he wants children to be able to “opt in” to eugenic ‘science’ programs that would make Goebbels blush with pride. Now ten-year-olds can be propagandized at school with the anxiety-provoking lie that they have to be afraid of getting genital cancer from something that almost everybody in the world has at one time or another.

And now they can ask for – and receive – the dangerous Gardasil or Cervarix vaccine. And ‘dangerous’ is not hyperbole. This injection has already killed close to a seventy girls, young women and some boys, whose parents trusted the State-pharma complex.

The second bill, SB946, is supposed to help parents with vaccine-damaged (‘autistic’) children pay for medical care, rehabilitative education and special needs. But April, in reading the fine print, found that the bill is like the electronics you buy at Best Buy on a whim – it is obsolete before you get it out of the store. The bill expires in two years, at which point cash-strapped parents will have to muster more free time to fight the state again.

April writes: “[The bill] only pertains to private pay insurance; State-paid insurance will be exempt.”

In other words, those who can afford to pay for insurance are getting a hand. Those too poor to purchase exorbitant insurance, are stuck with a broken and decrepit State system.

And April notes, “It does not prevent insurance companies from raising rates as a result. In the meantime California is reducing its State funded programs for autism left and right – so what happens when the insurance companies start picking up the tab?”

“People won’t notice that their State funded programs have been removed until 2 years later when they are saddled with higher insurance premiums and no services. But people have short term memory and will have completely forgotten how they got there.”

The HIV Clause

How deeply has big pharma parasitized the State of California? April spied a rider to the bill that’s a real blood-sucker: “There is an additional, tag-along clause in SB 946 regarding HIV reporting.”

But what does “HIV reporting” have to do with Autism? Or even Gardasil? The answer is – California is broke, and in order to make up its endless budget shortfall, it is selling its children into pharmaceutical slavery.

Here’s how it works. Beyond asking for Gardasil, children in California can receive handfuls of the FDA’s most deadly drug – AZT – for another phony diagnosis – that of “HIV positive.”

AZT is a bone-killing, blood-suppressing, liver-destroying drug, recycled as a failed chemotherapy agent into the gay community in the late 1980s. It was given to gay men who were told they were “HIV positive,” but it did not help. The shameful and oft-hidden reality is that the death toll attributed to “HIV” in the 1990s was a direct result of AZT. Hundreds of thousands of gay men took high doses of the drug, though they were not sick, and died a short, agonizing death as a direct result.

The numbers tell the story – before the introduction of AZT, the “AIDS” death toll in was a little above 10,000 per year. After AZT, the number jumped to close to 50,000 per year, and stayed there until AZT was reduced from 1200 milligram doses, down to one or two hundred milligrams. AIDS researchers claimed a victory at that point, but the reality was that they just stopped killing so many patients so quickly. This is a well-known and ‘open secret’ in the AIDS community, but like all uncomfortable truths, it is swept under a rug, out of sight of the American public.

But the biggest open secret in ‘HIV care’ is the tests themselves. HIV tests come up “positive” or reactive for hundreds of reasons – there is no end to the number of cross-reactions that occur with this obscenely immoral test. HIV tests do not test for any particular particle – they are cross-reactive with proteins that every human body produces daily. The medical literature demonstrates ably that HIV tests come up positive for the ingredients contained in – get this – HIV tests! That’s right. Taking an “HIV test” can itself make you “HIV positive.” And so can being vaccinated! Having the flu! Drinking milk! The list goes on and on.

And if a child of a parent who has been given this false diagnosis requests a test, in California, she or he can receive one without parental consent, or even awareness – and the drugs will follow: AZT, its many clones, and the drugs which replaced it – less toxic in the immediate dose, but fatal in the long-term.

A parent never has to know. Your child can go to school, be filled with anxiety and dread about diseases which they do not have, request drugs which will kill them, and receive them, eat them, swallow them, and be poisoned by them, all without your consent or awareness. You never have to say “yes.” You never even have to know.

And your child can come home, and fall ill with a mortified liver, or unheard of gastric problems, or skin that peels off in bloody swaths – such are the well-recorded effects of Gardasil, AZT or Nevirapine. And no one will ever be able to tell you why; and no one will be responsible.

Increasing the Numbers, Selling Children to the State

April revealed the ‘insurance’ bill as a wholesale scam to get insurance companies off the hook for vaccine damages. The poor get nothing, the State removes the help it now offers, and two years later the whole thing disappears. But these agents of pharmocracy have also crafted an add-on, one that will increase the number of “HIV positive” young people – especially lower-income victims of government schools. April writes, “When a person comes up HIV positive it must be reported to the State Health Officials. This generates revenue for the State. However, there’s a lengthy form that many don’t bother to fill out.”

But, says April, the insurance bill “does away with the form, allowing them to put the person diagnosed with HIV on a list, thereby increasing the number of reported cases, and increasing the revenue for the State.”

So what’s the harm, you ask? We’re reporting more cases to the State. But remember, these tests and diagnoses are criminally negligent, and allow doctors to sell the most toxic – and most expensive drugs – to entire populations. But what if the populations can’t afford the drugs?

That’s where you come in. The tax-payers pay drug companies to give deadly drugs to the “HIV positives,” in California, and around the world.

“And you’d better believe that in the next reporting cycle we’ll see headlines reading ‘California HIV rates soar.’” says April. “People will have no idea this is due to this change in law, and will be begging for the HIV vaccine. Low and behold there is already a law in place that will allow minors to – you guessed it – take the HIV vaccine without parental consent.”

“Moonbeam knew what he was doing.” She says. “Both of these bills were to be signed as planned on the same day as a mirage. Parents will think, ‘Victory on one side, defeat on the other.’ But really the only one who wins is Big pharma; increased revenue for the State so they can continue their raids on health food stores. And Brown probably confused people enough to get re-elected.”

The result of this crisis is that there will be more dead children. More deaths from vaccines and deadly chemicals given to minors – both U.S. citizens and illegal aliens. Is this an undercover targeting of the poor in California? Or are do-gooding liberals so in love with the myth of ‘better living through chemistry’ that they can’t be bothered to read one single package insert from an actual drug or test that they mandate?

Either way, the only solution to this crisis is to nullify Brown’s ruling. Parents must withdraw all consent from the State to perform medical procedures on their children, even if that means pulling them out of public schools, and starting a home-schooling or charter school in your area – or in your home. Further, ‘we the people’ have to share medical information openly and without concern for what the Federal Government considers appropriate. If they won’t show us the package inserts, and give us freedom of choice, then we will.

It is up to you – everyone reading this – to go and talk to your friends, family, school officials, local parent groups, about these deadly myths: The myth of the ‘virus that causes cervical cancer.’ The myth of ‘life-saving AIDS drugs.’ And they myth of ‘HIV testing.’

These may be hard subjects to broach, but we all have a responsibility to self-educate, and to save those who cannot yet make critical decisions from a State which has been lobotomized by an infected ‘science,’ which cares nothing for facts, critical thinking, compassion or choice. We must all of us, every day, fight tyranny, most of all by interjecting reality into the public square, by speaking about controversies, and by supporting independence of thought and action throughout our troubled country.

Original article: http://liamscheff.com/2011/10/april-boden-reveals-big-pharmas-plan-to-destroy-californias-children/

Gardasil and Cervarix Realities, Side Effects, Dangers:

HIV Testing:

AIDS Drugs:

Posted in BIG PHARMA, genocide, Population control, vaccine, vaccine lies, VACCINE SCAMS, vaccines | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments »

Lessons Not Learned: More Than 60% of Americans Still Plan On Getting Flu Vaccine

Posted by angelbabe43 on October 1, 2011

After all the accessible information available to the U.S. population on the dangers of vaccines, new survey data shows the message may not be getting through to the majority of people. Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults plan to be vaccinated against the flu this season.

Since the source of the survey comes from the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, the results may certainly be skewed, exaggerated or purposely and maliciously erroneous to convince the population of compliance. The opposite may be true. Recall a pollduring the 2009 H1N1 scare where 1,678 U.S. parents were interviewed by the University of Michigan‘s C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, and only 40% said they would get their children immunized against the H1N1 virus.

Back then, among those who said they did not intend to have their kids vaccinated against influenza, almost half — 46% — indicated they were not worried about their children becoming ill with the pandemic virus.

However, there is strong evidence from simple internet queries suggesting that many people still believe in the ridiculous notion that vaccines somehow prevent the flu.

William Schaffner, MD, and president of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases stated that “influenza vaccine remains the best prevention for the seasonal viral disease.”

As usual, statements from such foundations can be nothing further from the truth when it comes to the reality of flu shots. Since they always have an agenda, especially when sponsored by pharmaceutical giants, they can never be trusted to tell us the truth.

Since the pharmacokinetic properties of vaccines are not studied, vaccine manufacturers cannot deny any of the toxic effects of their ingredients. The reason they never analyze the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of these ingredients is because it would eradicate the vaccine industry. However the individual effects of each ingredient and their toxic effects on cells are well documented.

For example, most flu vaccines contain formaldehyde which is a known carcinogen. Many contain sterile agents such as Polysorbate 80. Other common immuntoxins and neurotoxins are sodium deoxycholate, thimerosal, oxtoxynol 10, MSG, neomycin sulfate, potassium chloride and polymyxin. The Goal of Every H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine: Immunotoxicity, Neurotoxicity and Sterility.

Anyone who had received five flu vaccinations has 10 times more chances to get affected with Alzheimer’s than if he/she got just one or two jabs, as stated by Hugh Fudenberg MD, world’s leading immunogeneticist.

“This is because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction”, said Fudenberg. So, he recommended that the flu shot had no much benefit so it was better to avoid them.

In one paper, international researchers analyzed all the data from patient studies on the flu vaccine performed worldwide in the last 37 years and discovered that vaccines showed at best a “modest” ability to prevent influenza or its complications in elderly people.

“The runaway 100 percent effectiveness that’s touted by proponents was nowhere to be seen,” said Tom Jefferson, a researcher in Rome with the Cochrane Vaccine Fields project, an international consortium of scientists who perform systematic reviews of research data.

The remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations and also noted that the vast majority of trials were inadequate.

The authors stated that the only ones showing benefit were industry-funded. They also pointed out that the industry-funded studies were more likely to be published in the most prestigious journals…and one more thing: They found cases of severe harm caused by the vaccines, in spite of inadequate reporting of adverse effects.

The study, “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults”, is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions, the drug testing industry and the medical system that relies on them.

To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate presents compelling evidence that vaccinating against any flu vaccine is simply a waste of time and hazardous to your health.

50 Reasons To Protect Infants From Vaccines shows several scientific arguments on why vaccines should never be given to children.

The Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex unveils the flawed predictive science used to publicize our health agencies’ influenza statistics and mortality rates and the corruption so prevalent at the CDC.

A Canadian-led study concluded that vaccinating nursing-home workers does nothing to cut the number of confirmed influenza cases among the homes’ elderly residents.

9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims shows why every vaccine is based on fradulent science and misinformed scientists.

Synergistic Toxicity: Study Shows That More Vaccines Are Linked To Higher Death Rates explains a study published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal which found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates.

Vaccines Did Not Save Us! shows two centuries of official statistics proving conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.

Natural Infectious Disease Declines vs. Vaccination Effectiveness and Dangers major shows how declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed.

Five Myths to Keep in Mind About Flu Vaccines

Myth 1: The Flu Shot is very effective.
Statistically, you are less likely to get the flu if you haven’t had a flu vaccine. A BCTV reporter in Vancouver, commenting on the overload in BC emergency rooms, said that out of 32 people who had received a flu shot, 30 got the flu.

Myth 2: The Flu Shot has a high success rate.
This is a vaccine that only has a 6.25% success rate. This is a pretty big under-achievement, considering that the average reaction to placebo injections of distilled water is 30%.

Myth 3: The Flu Shot is safe.
Hugh Fudenberg MD, who is the world’s leading immunogeneticist, says that if a person had 5 flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 he/she is 10 times more likely to get Alzheimer’s Disease than if he/she had only one or two shots. Fudenberg said that this was because of the aluminum and mercury, which almost every flu vaccine contains. The gradual accumulation of aluminum and mercury in the brain leads to cognitive dysfunction.

Myth 4: There are no harmful ingredients in vaccinations.

Flu vaccines consist primarily of 3 categories of ingredients. First there are viruses and cultured bacteria. The second ingredient is the way in which they can be cultivated. This includes aborted human fetal cells, chick embryos, pig blood, monkey kidney tissue, cowpox pus, and calf serum, and all of these foreign proteins get injected straight into your bloodstream. A bit repulsive just thinking about it, isn’t it? The flu shot also contains neutralizers, stabilizers, carrying agents and preservatives such as mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is something that is used for embalming the dead and is known to cause cancer. There is no amount of formaldehyde considered safe when injected into a living organism.

Myth 5: The Flu Shot works.
The flu shot could actually weaken your immune system and make you more likely to catch this virus. It has absolutely no value and should probably be avoided for your own safety. Not only is it loaded with toxic chemicals, but many people actually get the flu shortly after getting the shot, because it weakens their immune system instead of making it stronger like it is claimed to do

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/080709_swine_flu_hype.shtml

Posted in DEPOPULATION, FLU VACCINE LIES, H1N1 HOAX, Population control, vaccine lies | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

The Georgia Guidestones

Posted by angelbabe43 on April 15, 2011

Georgia Guidestones

Image via Wikipedia

The origin of that strange monument is shrouded in mystery because no one knows the true identity of the man, or men, who commissioned its construction. All that is known for certain is that in June 1979, a well-dressed, articulate stranger visited the office of the Elberton Granite Finishing Company and announced that he wanted to build an edifice to transmit a message to mankind. He identified himself as R. C. Christian, but it soon became apparent that was not his real name. He said that he represented a group of men who wanted to offer direction to humanity, but to date, almost two decades later, no one knows who R. C. Christian really was, or the names of those he represented. Several things are apparent. The messages engraved on the Georgia Guidestones deal with four major fields: (1) Governance and the establishment of a world government, (2) Population and reproduction control, (3) The environment and man’s relationship to nature, and (4) Spirituality.

In the public library in Elberton, I found a book written by the man who called himself R.C. Christian. I discovered that the monument he commissioned had been erected in recognition of Thomas Paine and the occult philosophy he espoused. Indeed, the Georgia Guidestones are used for occult ceremonies and mystic celebrations to this very day. Tragically, only one religious leader in the area had the courage to speak out against the American Stonehenge, and he has recently relocated his ministry.

On one of the highest hilltops in Elberton County, Georgia stands a huge granite monument. Engraved in eight different languages on the four giant stones that support the common capstone are 10 Guides, or commandments. That monument is alternately referred to as The Georgia Guidestones, or the American Stonehenge. Though relatively unknown to most people, it is an important link to the Occult Hierarchy that dominates the world in which we live.

THE MESSAGE OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.

Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million will require the extermination of nine-tenths of the world’s people. The American Stonehenge’s reference to establishing a world court foreshadows the current move to create an International Criminal Court and a world government. The Guidestones’ emphasis on preserving nature anticipates the environmental movement of the 1990s, and the reference to “seeking harmony with the infinite” reflects the current effort to replace Judeo-Christian beliefs with a new spirituality.

The message of the American Stonehenge also foreshadowed the current drive for Sustainable Development. Any time you hear the phrase “Sustainable Development” used, you should substitute the term “socialism” to be able to understand what is intended. Later in this syllabus you will read the full text of the Earth Charter which was compiled under the direction of Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong. In that document you will find an emphasis on the same basic issues: control of reproduction, world governance, the importance of nature and the environment, and a new spirituality. The similarity between the ideas engraved on the Georgia Guidestones and those espoused in the Earth Charter reflect the common origins of both.

Yoko Ono, the widow of John Lennon, was recently quoted as referring to the American Stonehenge, saying:

“I want people to know about the stones … We’re headed toward a world where we might blow ourselves up and maybe the globe will not exist … it’s a nice time to reaffirm ourselves, knowing all the beautiful things that are in this country and the Georgia Stones symbolize that. ” (1)

What is the true significance of the American Stonehenge, and why is its covert message important? Because it confirms the fact that there was a covert group intent on

(1) Dramatically reducing the population of the world.
(2) Promoting environmentalism.
(3) Establishing a world government.
(4) Promoting a new spirituality.

Certainly the group that commissioned the Georgia Guidestones is one of many similar groups working together toward a New World Order, a new world economic system, and a new world spirituality. Behind those groups, however, are dark spiritual forces. Without understanding the nature of those dark forces it is impossible to understand the unfolding of world events.

The fact that most Americans have never heard of the Georgia Guidestones or their message to humanity reflects the degree of control that exists today over what the American people think. We ignore that message at our peril.

No related posts.

Short URL: http://oneworldscam.com/?p=25

Posted in Bilderberg, Concpiracy, David Rockefeller, DEPOPULATION, FEMA, Floride, genocide, Georgia Guidestones, H1N1 HOAX, HAARP, HUMANITY, NEW WORLD ORDER, POISONING, Population control, Rockefeller, Rothchilds | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Government Documents Show DDT Contaminated Milk

Posted by angelbabe43 on April 12, 2011

U.S. Department of Agriculture Visitor's Cente...

Image via Wikipedia

By Jeffry John Aufderheide | March 25th, 2011

Heralded as a scientific miracle, the pesticide Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) was used to control malaria during World War II. By the mid 1950s, Americans were duped into allowing over 31 million acres of land to be sprayed with this “harmless” poison. Years later congressional reports tell a totally different story.

Yet scientists of the day knew DDT stored in fatty tissue “…at least as early as 1945 that DDT presents a potential residue problem.” [1] Stammers, et al. noted in 1947, “The possibilities of cumulative effects from storage of DDT in milk and tissues of sheep and cattle require further investigation.” [2] In the late 1940’s, Schechter and colleagues developed methods to detect contamination, “of such products as milk, butter, eggs, meat, and fats when farm animals consume DDT-treated feed,” and show that DDT, “can be excreted in milk.” [3]

Remember those dates, folks, because claiming ignorance that “we didn’t know back then” doesn’t quite work anymore. Moreover, it was hoped the DDT contamination problem would “just go away” and those provisions were inserted in section 331(c) of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964.

“Until recently there was reasonable prospect that the problem [pesticide residues] would have diminished to a point by June 30, 1967, that further extension of the authority would not be necessary. However, in recent months, several large producers in the Rio Grande Valley have had their milk removed from the market because of DDT residue. The local dairymen, Texas and New Mexico State agencies, dairy and cotton associations, and our Agricultural Research Service, have undertaken to determine the causes by tests in Arizona.”

SOURCE: Dairy Indemnity Payments. 90th Congress, 1st Session. Senate Report 476. August 3, 1967

It’s pretty apparent the public never was supposed to know about that happening.
Got DDT?

When it was obvious pesticide residue levels weren’t dropping as hoped, the Dairy Indemnity Payment Program, or DIPP, officially was created through public law in 1968 to reimburse farmers whose milk was contaminated with pesticides. However, in reading the congressional Dairy Indemnity Payments reports that talk candidly about the widespread contamination, it is then that we see the full extent of the cavalier agricultural practices promoted by the U.S. Government.

“The problem which our dairy farmers are facing has been brought about by the use of chemicals approved by the Federal Government to dust crops. Some of these chemicals have been found to contaminate feeds. The contamination passes on into the milk and when the residues of pesticides is [sic] found to be of too high a level, the farmers are forced to dump their milk, taking it out of commercial channels. The result has been disastrous to the dairy farmers involved, some of which have had to go into bankruptcy.”

“There had been at that time, reasonable prospect that the problem would have diminished to a point that further extension of the authority would not have been necessary. However, as the Department testified then, several large producers had their milk removed from the market because of DDT residue. The problem had in fact not been solved. The local dairymen, the State governments involved, dairy and cotton associations, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have been cooperating in an effort to rid us of this problem. The problem, however, still continues and it appears that it will continue for the forseeable (sic) years to come.”

SOURCE: Dairy Indemnity Payments. 90th Congress, 2nd Session. Senate Report 1363. July 8, 1968

What does DDT have to do with vaccines? Well, I’m glad you asked.
A Spoonful of MediSIN…

To prove the safety of DDT, apologists often point anecdotally to Merck Chemist, Joseph J. Jacobs, slurping spoonfuls of the white stuff before public speeches. This act, to them, apparently validates the chemical’s safety across the board for all persons. Fortunately, Joseph wasn’t lactating at the time.

Wait a minute! Did I just say Merck? Who do you think was a producer of DDT?

Not only did Merck mass-produce DDT for controlling malaria in Italy during WWII, Merck also formulated and manufactured a polio vaccine in response to the 1952 polio epidemic. The detection of the cancer-causing virus (SV40) in polio vaccine by Merck scientist, Maurice Hilleman, will be the focus of a future article.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Hilleman)

Enter Henry Kumm.

Henry Kumm worked at the International Health Division of the Rockefeller Foundation for Medical Research in 1928. During World War II, Kumm experimented with larvicides containing DDT to control the spread of malaria in Italy. [4]

Additionally, according to the Medical Archives at John Hopkins,

“In 1951 [a year before the polio outbreak], he resigned from the Rockefeller Foundation to accept a position as assistant director of research at the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis. He conducted field trials in the study of gamma globulin and the Salk vaccine and became the director of research in 1954. Rejoining the Rockefeller Foundation in 1959, Kumm retired as an associate professor in 1964.” [5]

To tie up a few loose ends, you should know the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (NFIP) was supposed to investigate the cause of polio. That foundation also had invested millions of dollars into researching a possible polio vaccine prior to the 1952 polio epidemic.

Years after the polio epidemic in 1979, researchers Gabliks and Utz reported, “Studies in cell cultures with insecticides…indicated increased replication of poliovirus in human cells exposed to Kelthane, Karathane, and DDT. Furthermore an activation of a latent virus was also observed in primary rabbit kidney cells grown in the presence of DDT.” [6]

Do you think it would be a cold day in hell before Good Old Henry Kumm would make a possible correlation between a polio outbreak and the spraying of pesticides? However, there were more profits to be made from polio vaccines than recommending people stop drinking DDT-contaminated milk, wasn’t there?

“The phenomenal growth in production and use of chemical control agents is illustrated by the fact that in 1940 these products had a wholesale value of about $40 million. Today (August 12th, 1959) it is $290 million and is estimated to reach $1 billion by 1975. One-sixth of all croplands and millions of acres of forests, rangelands, and marshlands are treated annually with these chemicals…”

“…Before 1940, relatively small amounts of such chemicals as nicotine, rotenone, pyrethrum, and the aresenicals (sic) were used for insect control. During and following World War II a rapid changeover to DDT, heptachlor, dieldrin, TEPP, malathion, and related compounds occurred.”

SOURCE: Authorizing Research on Insecticides, Herbicides, Fungicides, and Other Pesticides by the Secretary of the Interior. 85th Congress, 2nd Session. House of Representatives Report No. 2181. July 16, 1958.

In Conclusion

In order to keep the American people hoodwinked about the toxicity of DDT, attempts are still made by corporate interests to dispel the dangers. Yet, each new piece of information brings us shockingly closer to the truth. At the end of the line, the core message still remains stubbornly in-line with the corporate sickness care agenda: take more vaccines, consume more pills, and wind up getting sicker!

As a result of DDT application, can we just be imagining more cancer, more autism, and more chronic illnesses? Despite superficial attempts by government agencies to ‘get to the bottom’ of a problem, taxpayers shouldn’t be suckered into waiting twenty years to get answers. I certainly don’t want to wait at all, since toxic products should not be permitted into the food chain at any phase of production. P.T. Barnum said, “There’s a sucker born every minute,” and that’s what they apparently are relying on.

>>CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL CONGRESSIONAL REPORTS<<

References:

1. Wayland, J. Present Status of Our Knowledge of DDT Intoxication. Am. J. of Public Health, (1955) 45: 478-485. 2. Stammers, F.M.G., and Whitefield, F.G.S. The Toxicity of DDT to Men and Animals. Bull. Ent. Res., (1947) 38:1-73.

3. Schechter, M.S., Pogerelskin, M.A., and Haller, H.L. Colorimetric Determination of DDT in Milk and Fatty Materials. U.S. Dept. of Ag. (1947) 19:1.

4. Snowden, F.M. (2006). The Conquest of Malaria: Italy, 1900-1962, (pp. 200). Frederick W. Hilles Publication Fund of Yale University.

5. Medical Archives of The John Hopkins Medical Institutions. Henry W. Kumm Collection. Retrieved March 25th , 2011 from http://www.medicalarchives.jhmi.edu/papers/kumm.html

6. Gabliks, J., and Utz, C. DDT and Inflammatory Responses; 1. Influenza Infection in Mice Fed DDT. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology (1979) 12, 257-263.

Posted in D.D.T., DEPOPULATION, dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, poisoned milk, POISONING, Population control, Radioactive milk | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Vaccine Deaths From MMR/MR

Posted by angelbabe43 on April 9, 2011

MMR/MR vaccine deaths
[back] MMR vaccines [back] Vaccine Death [back] Lies

Chief Liar UK[More children are killed now (35 UK 1990 est, with one media report mentioning  26 deaths) by the vaccine than would ever be killed by measles (around 1 under Allopathy), compounded by the fact measles is a safe disease under proper medical care such as use of vitamin C, while the Government spin doctors (aka liars) say it is safe and doesn’t kill (UK) even though families have been compensated for MMR deaths in the UK and the USA government admits it can kill.  See the long running  Vaccines are Safe‘ lie.  They have been getting away with this for over 150 years (see Smallpox vaccine deaths).  See also: Media vaccine victim stories for some of the MMR damage such as autism.]

MMR: Any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above events. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act Vaccine Injury Table

[1998] Weibel et al Acute Encephalopathy Followed by Permanent Brain Injury or Death Associated With Further Attenuated Measles Vaccines: A Review of Claims Submitted to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Eight children died, and the remainder had mental regression and retardation, chronic seizures, motor and sensory deficits, and movement disorders.

Chief Liars:
[UK] “MMR directly protects children against SSPE and death — it does not cause it..”—–Dr Elizabeth Miller 2002

[UK] “This (MMR)  is a safe vaccine.”——-Dr David Salisbury

[USA]  “Because the measles vaccine has no serious permanent side effects, its benefits still clearly outweigh its risks.”  MMR: Measles, Mumps and Rubella Vaccine. Vaccine Education Center – Children’s Hospital [Bear in mind Dr Offit considers safe to be Benefits Outweigh Risks.]

See: Smallpox vaccine Diphtheria vaccine 1919-1948 VAERS deaths Gardasil deaths Swine flu vaccine deaths Flu vaccine deaths DPT deaths

Deaths
[Video] Something in the System When a child dies of measles the story hits the headlines. But when children die after the MMR jab, their stories are hard to find. Sarah Moore talks about the death of her daughter after the MMR jab and questions the legitimacy of results produced by the British Government.

[2009 Dec] 8 year old Dutch boy died 3 days after receiving a MMR/DTP vaccine

[2009] My daughter died from a mmr vaccine

MMR death (George Fisher)

[2008] Did your child suffer a severe side effect from a vaccine? Garry and Rachel Williams will receive $250,000 from the government for the death of their daughter. The Williams claimed the Mumps, Measles, Rubella Vaccine or MMR killed their daughter.

[2008 Dec] Baby died ten days after being given MMR jab ‘because of failure to warn of possible complications’

[2008 Oct] Settlement in death of 1-year old Springfield girl from MMR vaccine

VACCINES INJURE UP TO 7500 AND KILL UP TO 70 A YEAR WITH 1990 SERIOUS REACTIONS in the UK, there were approximately 70 deaths associated with triple vaccines (DTP and MMR)

[Feb 2007 MMR] Mother accused of killing baby son goes free

[Media Dec 2006 Ireland] £2m payout over children disabled by vaccinations

[NVIC June 2006] Babies Die After MMR
Every day that government health officials lie to the people about vaccine risks is one more day that the public loses a little more trust in what they are told by government. …..MMR vaccine is known to induce brain inflammation and death within 8 to 14 days after vaccination……They and parents like them are standing up and coming forward to witness what has happened to their babies at the hands of pediatricians who told them that vaccines, including the MMR vaccine, are absolutely safe.    The vaccine deaths of these babies might have been prevented if George and Anna’s parents had been given full and accurate information about MMR vaccine risk factors and pediatricians had erred on the side of caution rather than vaccinate at all costs. The rabid zeal to vaccinate, encouraged by government health officials, puts many vulnerable children at risk and the result is the brain damaging and killing of children like George and Anna.

[Media June 18, 2006] Two babies die days after the MMR jab
[Media June 2006] We won’t allow MMR cover-up say parents of tragic toddlers

[Media May 2006 MMR Priorix vaccine] GSK says Priorix involvement in Vietnam death unconfirmed

[Media March 2005] £85,000 for parents of MMR victim (Buxton)
[Daily Mail (UK) 18/5/04] MMR Killed My Daughter
[Media Japan, March 2003, MMR death & serious brain damage] Families win lawsuit over MMR vaccine
[Media Private Eye 18-31 Oct 2002]  MMR death
[Media May 2002] MMR deaths awarded by VDPU but denied by UK government (Buxton, Dwyer)

[Media 1/2002 MMR deaths] Were all of these children killed by the triple MMR jab? In 1995 the Government’s vaccine damage tribunal paid £30,000 compensation to James Smith, of Gateshead, for brain damage after he was given MMR at the age of four. James died nine years later aged 13…..Judith Dwyer, received a payment after her four-year-old daughter Chloe died following a ‘booster’ jab of Urabe containing MMR in 1989. ‘Chloe first developed pins and needles in her legs, then paralysis and problems breathing. She was rushed to hospital but it was too late.’

[Media UK, Jan 2001] MMR VACCINE IN JAPAN

[Media UK, Jan 1998, MMR–death] Baby (Harriet Moore) dies after measles jab

[Media Japan, March 2003, MMR death] Govt, group ordered to pay in vaccine suit

MMR: Any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above events. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act Vaccine Injury Table

MMR vaccine VAERS reports 7 deaths per year (1990-1994):
“From July 1990 thro’ April 1994, 5799 ADRs following MMR vaccination were reported to US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS); including 3063 cases requiring emergency medical treatment, 616 hospitalisations, 309 who did not recover, 54 children left disabled and 30 deaths.”— John P Heptonstall

MMR Urabe: [See: MMR Pluserix & Immravax (Urabe).]
“Out of the 90 children on that list, 24 received a vaccine called Pluserix-MMR manufactured by SmithKline Beecham. It was withdrawn in the UK on the 14th September 1992 because of “reports of mild transient meningitis.”    “Of the children that received Pluserix-MMR on that list, 3 died (1 after meningitis) , 4 had meningitis symptoms, 5 epilepsy, 5 had become autistic, 1 suffered from rheumatoid arthritis, 1 had severe urticaria and 2 had mumps. 6 had their speech affected – forgetting language skills they had acquired, 1 went deaf. 6 from this time suffered from delayed development and 4 were very very disturbed. One of the deaths was from the Guillain-Barré syndrome – where antibodies are produced that attack the body’s own cells . 7 or more suffered frequent fits or convulsions, 1 had terrible screaming fits.  Thirteen of the children on that list received Immravax made by the French company, Merieux UK Ltd. This was also withdrawn on the same date and for the same reason as Pluserix-MMR – because of “reports of mild transient meningitis.”.   Of the children that received Immravax; 6 became epileptic, 1 nearly died from encephalitis, 3 had meningitis, 1 measles and 1 mumps, 5 had speech and communication problems, 3 became slow developers, 7 had frequent fits and convulsions, 2 went into the kind of terrible screaming fits that are associated with brain trauma.”—Jani Roberts http://www.gn.apc.org/inquirer/jabs.html

http://shotofprevention.com/2011/04/07/listing-vaccine-ingredients-and-understanding-them-theres-a-difference/#comment-2429

    Posted in genocide, H1N1 HOAX, Population control, vaccine lies, vaccines | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

    The BioPirates of Science: Genetic Engineering – Science or Hoax?

    Posted by angelbabe43 on April 8, 2011

    Genetic Engineering (song)

    Image via Wikipedia

    By Barbara H. Peterson
    Farm Wars

    Only in America can a beleaguered company with a checker past such as Monsanto’s, which includes a nasty little habit of poisoning entire towns with toxic waste, battle it’s way to the top of the dung heap to deliver a fatal blow to the people and planet with a deadly and insidious type of chemical and biological warfare via the genetic modification and patenting of transgenic seeds, as well as the coating of our farmland with toxic chemicals.

    And to top it all off, the U.S. government, which is supposed to be financed by we the people, is actively promoting this biological warfare by stealthily allowing the rampant infection of approximately 85% of our processed food with unregulated transgenes that Monsanto executives admit will have unknown effects on the environment and life.

    Did I mention that these transgenes also include a virus that is 70-90% identical to the HIV and Hep B viruses?

    Genomic Map of CAMV Wikimedia Commons

    Because of the limitations of the technology, in most cases the process will also necessarily involve the insertion of genetic material from at least one foreign pathogen, the most common of which (the 35S promoter) is taken from a virus which is very similar to Hepatitis B and related to HIV. The consequences of using such elements have even been questioned by researchers at the John Innes Institute, one of the UK’s premier research establishments in the field of agricultural genetic engineering. Despite this, routine use of such pathogen-derived elements continues.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/eagmconf.htm

    The Cauliflower Mosaic Virus promoter (CaMV 35S) is used in most transgenic crops to activate foreign genes which have been artificially inserted into the host plant. It is potentially dangerous.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/camv.htm

    Did you get that? Approximately 85% of the processed food on our store shelves contains products infected with transgenic material containing a virus that is 70-90% identical to the HIV and Hep B viruses. And our government, in collusion with companies such as Monsanto, is in charge of the attack, using “science” as a battle shield to fend off any who would question their tactics. But can what these people are doing actually be called “science?”

    The “Science” of Genetic Engineering

    The scientific method is defined by Merriam-Webster Online as:

    Principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%2Bmethod

    Scientific methods are based on the recognition and formulation of a problem, collecting data through experiment and observation, then the formulation of a hypotheses, which leads to a solid conclusion of fact.

    After only 20 years or so of development genetic engineering still involves processes which are random and ‘trial and error’ in nature, and in that sense they are imprecise and unscientific. The biotechnologist has little or no prior predictive power as to how a new gene will behave in the host organism. Without demonstrable predictive power it is inappropriate to refer to any process as ‘engineering’ or ‘science-based’.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/eagmconf.htm

    After well over 20 years, just why is the so-called genetic engineering process still trial and error?

    Even in simple biological organisms like bacteria, the total potential interactions between genetic components run into many millions. These relationships have until now been managed by the intelligence of the organism’s own DNA. It is now proposed that these relationships should be ‘controlled’ by the same species whose own limited intelligence has mistakenly and irretrievably peppered the globe with unmanageable nuclear waste – man.

    In traditional plant breeding it is the highly sophisticated discriminatory intelligence of the plant which ultimately determines which genes may be accepted as part of the newly created organism, and it is that same intelligence which determines their placement and functioning within it. This process is driven by the information and knowledge contained within the DNA of the plant itself and exercised as an integral part of the natural sexual breeding process.

    With genetic engineering this process is completely bypassed. Single genes are selected by the ‘scientist’ and randomly inserted into the genome of the host organism. The scientist has no control over their placement. In fact the plant geneticist has little or no knowledge as to where the new genes should be placed in any case; and usually he does not know where they have actually lodged even after his work has been completed. He simply “hopes for the best.” Furthermore the inserted genes will frequently be taken from totally unrelated species.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/eagmconf.htm

    The genetic engineering process:
    Aggie the Traveling Agrobacterium

    And still, no valid risk assessment testing is done.

    The problem with calling genetically engineered organisms safe is that there are no valid risk assessments being done on them. There is no research, really, being done into the health or environmental effects of a genetically engineered organism. Certainly no work that is published in the peer-reviewed literature that isn’t proprietary. Corporations promoting these things claim that they have done research, but you can’t get any information on it because it’s all claimed to be proprietary.

    As Dr. Bereano explains in this interview, genetic engineering is based on an extremely oversimplified model that suggests that by taking out or adding one or several genes, you can create a particular effect or result.

    However, this reductionist model is nowhere near complete.

    “First of all, genomes are so complicated with so many interactions within the genes of the genome that we don’t really understand it well,” Dr. Bereano says. “Let me give a simple example.

    The genome in a cell in your eyeball is identical to the genome of a cell in your pancreas, but your eyeball does not make insulin. The constituents of what’s in a genome are not the end of the story as to what that cell is going to produce and do.

    There are in the human body maybe about 30,000 genes but there are millions of proteins. These proteins are produced by very subtle and different interactions among the genes in different locations in the body. There are proteins which turn on insulin manufacturing to the cells in the pancreas and don’t turn it on in your eyeball

    … It’s important to understand that the structure of the genome is not determinative of what that cell does.

    Yet, the kind of mental model that’s being used in all of these discussions is what I call the Lego model or the tinker toy model. Let’s take out a yellow piece or let’s put in a green piece… but it’s not an issue just of structure—it’s of interaction.

    These things are not being studied well. How stable is this genome after it is altered? In many instances we don’t know. It might change spontaneously. There are lots of questions there.

    They have this very simplistic model and then they claim that these results are going to flow from it. But biology is much more complicated than that.”

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/04/02/dr-philip-bereano-on-gmos.aspx

    Laboratory Accreditation and Industry Oversight

    We can see from the above information that the “science” of genetic engineering is conducted in no way resembling any form of true scientific methodology, so how do we know that companies such as Monsanto are even qualified to conduct such experiments? We don’t. Biotech laboratories seem to be bereft of any form of mandatory accreditation process. In fact, it seems that any accreditation is voluntary.

    Theoretically, it seems that Monsanto could set up shop in a cardboard box, create a frankenvirus, get peer reviewed studies from other labs in cardboard boxes, then unleash this abomination on the world without consequences for its actions if/when people die. Especially when backed by the U.S. government. I cannot find any evidence that accreditation and compliance with set scientific standards is anything but voluntary. You pay to play.

    A quick search of The American Association for Laboratory Accreditation for Monsanto Crop Analytics provides us with the following 2 accreditations involving one laboratory HERE and HERE, which are very specific regarding only a certain few procedures.

    On the USDA site, in the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) section, the following authority is claimed:

    In order to protect plant health, Biotechnology Regulatory Services (BRS) implements the APHIS regulations for certain genetically engineered (GE) organisms that may pose a risk to plant health. APHIS coordinates these responsibilities along with the other designated federal agencies as part of the Federal Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology.

    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/brs_main.shtml

    There are regulations for “certain” GE organisms that may pose a risk to plant health. How about posing a risk to human health? Evidently, that doesn’t count. So off we go, down the road, Monsanto hand in hand with the USDA, conducting chemical and biological warfare on American citizens first, then spreading onwards and upwards to the rest of the world. Accreditation? We don’t need no stinkin’ accreditation – not with the USDA covering our backs!

    APHIS inspectors and compliance specialists perform targeted inspections of field tests and thoroughly evaluate all potential noncompliance incidents. BRS also evaluates facilities, equipment, records of developers, and potential incidents reported by permittees. Authorizations under the permitting and notification procedures require that noncompliance incidents be self-reported within designated time frames.

    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/compliance_main.shtml

    A self-reporting clause. The agency, (APHIS/USDA), conducts “targeted inspections” and evaluates “non-compliance” issues that are self-reported by the permittees. It can’t get any better than that for Monsanto.

    The Sky’s the Limit

    So, without proper oversight, genetic markers in hand, Monsanto and the U.S. government are conducting the world’s largest unscientific, under-regulated experiment on the population at large. And we are paying for it. We are systematically being poisoned, our DNA is changing, new and resistance bacteria and superweeds are cropping up, and Monsanto gets paid for the carnage, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer. We are literally paying for our own demise at the hands of so-called “scientists” gone wild. This is not a science fiction movie, it is what we are living, and somehow, I don’t think Duck and Cover will cut it.

    http://farmwars.info/?p=5648

    http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/jan08/organic_practice_standard_and_gmo_contamination.php

    http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/april2011/organicnongmocornoutperformsgmo.php

    Posted in Food freedom, gmo, MONSANTO, NON GMO, NWO, NWO CONSPIRACY, Population control | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    The downfall of science and the rise of intellectual tyranny

    Posted by angelbabe43 on April 8, 2011

    Friday, January 21, 2011
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles…)

    (NaturalNews) The very reputation of so-called “science” has been irreparably damaged by the invocation of the term “science” by GMO lackeys, pesticide pushers, mercury advocates and fluoride poisoners who all claim to have science on their side. It seems that every toxin, contamination and chemical disaster that now infects our planet has been evangelized in the name of “science.”

    Where “science” used to be highly regarded in the 1950’s, today the term is largely exploited by pharmaceutical companies, biotech giants and chemical companies to push their own for-profit agendas. Actual science has little to do with the schemes now being pushed under the veil of science.

    To make matters even worse for the sciences, many so-called “science bloggers” have been revealed to have financial ties to the very same companies whose profits are shored up by their activities (http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/08/&#8230;).

    Rather than defending any sort of scientific truth, science bloggers have become the internet whores of Big Pharma, Monsanto, pesticide manufacturers, chemical companies and toxic mercury factories. There’s hardly a dangerous chemical in widespread use today that the science bloggers haven’t venomously defended as safe and effective. Many are just blatantly paid off by corporate entities to run around the internet pushing GMOs, chemicals and vaccines.

    This realization has caused the science bloggers to be widely ridiculed by intelligent people who see right through their thinly-veiled (but well-funded) disinformation campaigns. Where science bloggers once had credibility, they now are seen as intellectual prostitutes for dangerous corporate agendas that benefit powerful companies at the expense of environmental health and human health.

    If they weren’t doing all this in the name of science, it wouldn’t be so bad, actually. If they called themselves “corporate whore bloggers” instead of “science bloggers,” their actions wouldn’t be so harmful to the reputation of science itself. But, to the great detriment of actual science, they insist on calling themselves “science bloggers.”

    Now the reputation of “science” itself is suffering
    Because the for-profit GMO sellouts, poison pushers, vaccine zealots and corporate front groups continue to conduct their activities under the false name of “science,” the term is losing its meaning. This should be cause for alarm among those who practice legitimate science. (Where are the astrobiologists when you need them?)

    As we’ve seen all too frequently, “science” can be easily distorted or exploited to achieve a desired political or profiteering goal. But the ruse is rather apparent — the public is awakening to the science fraud and learning that the term “science” doesn’t really mean what it used to. It’s suffering a loss of reputation to such a degree that the term “science” no longer means a system whereby intellectually honest people search for the underlying truths of how nature operates. Today, “science” is used not to search for truth, but to distort the truth.

    Replace “science” with “fraud” to understand the spin
    Instead of seeking knowledge and understanding, for example, “science” is used as an intellectual bludgeon to halt rational skepticism and discussion on topics such as GMOs, vaccines, mercury fillings, fluoride in the water, the mysterious deaths of animals, the collapse of honeybee populations and so on. It’s a kind of intellectual tyranny that has been invoked against those who oppose any kind of corporate agenda that can be dressed up to look like actual science.

    In several contexts, the term “science” has become synonymous with “fraud.” As in the following headlines (replace “science” with “fraud” as you read them):

    “It has now been revealed that the researchers who made up the fictitious study results were engaged in SCIENCE.”

    Or:

    “When asked how he came up with the fabricated clinical trial data upon which the FDA approved the drug, discredited researcher Humphrey Brokendata explained he was only engaged in SCIENCE.”

    In fact, the vast majority of the popular news reports you might read about so-called “scientific” findings make a whole lot more sense if you replace the word “science” with “fraud.” For example, imagine the words being exchanged in these headlines:

    • GMOs backed by solid SCIENCE

    • FDA insists its drug approvals are based on SCIENCE

    • Monsanto claims the SCIENCE behind its seed technology is better than ever

    Vaccines stand their ground this flu season thanks to SCIENCE

    You see how suddenly everything makes more sense on these particular topics when you replace “science” with “fraud?”

    This isn’t a stretch, either. The “scientific” agenda behind GMOs, for example, has absolutely nothing to do with real science. It is a corporate for-profit agenda that seeks control over the world’s food supply while forcing farmers to buy seeds year after year from one centralized corporate entity. That’s not science. It’s just a monopolistic crime against humanity to assault the basic rights of people to be able to grow their own foods and harvest their own seeds without worrying about those seeds being contaminated with genetic pollution from genetically engineered crops.

    The real science on GMOs indicates that reasonable people have every right to be concerned about the DNA pollution of the foods that feed our world. But through the blasphemous invocation of the term “unscientific,” the GMO pushers attempt to characterize rational, reasonable people who hold concerns about GMOs as “unscientific.” As if they didn’t believe in the Law of Gravity or Newtonian physics for macro-sized objects.

    The scientific community loses credibility by the day
    This endless assault on common sense by those who use the term “science” as a cover for dangerous global experiments in plant and human biology will only further discredit the scientific community. When you see “scientific” doctors and dentists putting their reputations behind things like water fluoridation — which is the blatant mass pollution of the water supply with a toxic hazardous waste chemical — it’s no surprise why the street cred of so-called “scientific thinkers” continues to erode.

    This is all very sad to see, of course. I consider myself a proponent of scientific thinking, and I strongly value the Scientific Method as one approach to gaining knowledge. I’m educated in microbiology, genetics, physics and have acquired a considerable amount of scientific knowledge in many other areas. I’m currently studying M-theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory) and the intersection of quantum physics with consciousness. (There’s a taboo topic in conventional scientific circles for ya — don’t talk about consciousness, for God’s sake! To quote Einstein, God may not play dice with the universe… but consciousness does!)

    As a proponent of scientific discovery, even I have to admit that science has lost its credibility due in large part to the corporate takeover of science. Whereas science was once a popular and highly respected field of study for young thinkers, very few people in America enter the sciences these days. More and more people are waking up to the reality that many of the great evils that have been unleashed upon our world have been conducted in the name of science: GMOs, seasonal flu vaccines, plastic food containers, pesticides, mercury poisoning, fluoride in the water supply, psychiatric pharmaceuticals and so on.

    Science, it turns out, hasn’t saved us: It has quite possibly doomed us. The destruction that has already been unleashed upon our world in the name of science may not be reversible in the era of humankind. We may be setting ourselves up for a global food supply catastrophe due to GMOs and pesticides, for example, and literally billions of human beings may ultimately die from it. “Science” was the invocation behind GMOs and pesticides, even though in truth the whole scheme was pulled off through what can only be called “junk science” or “selected science.”

    Real science is a valid tool when used with integrity
    Again, it saddens me to see science misappropriated in this way, because true science is a valid and valuable method by which human beings can seek to gain understanding about the universe in which we live. It is not the only pathway to knowledge, of course (a frequent mistaken assumption by those who are steeped in it), but it is a valuable one nonetheless. Yet thanks to today’s corporate-led “scientific” schemes involving GMOs, vaccines, pesticides and other chemicals, the value of science itself is being rapidly lost to the intellectual tyranny demonstrated by those who destroy our world in the name of science.

    Where real scientists once used to welcome debate and discussion, today’s “science” advocate operate with the intellectual finesse and flexibility of a two-ton block of granite. You either agree with them or you are branded an idiot. There is no discussion, no debate, no thought and no real science involved. On so many of the big issues that matter today — vaccines, GMOs, mercury, fluoride, pesticides and so on — the “science” position is that of a self-proclaimed dictator (or tyrant) who believes he causes things to be true and factual through the mere act of stating them. That isn’t science. It’s just an advanced form of arrogant bullying framed in the language of science and carried aloft by a never-ending stream of corporate dollars.

    It is, in essence, intellectual tyranny.

    Science may yet destroy us
    It was Oppenheimer who, after playing a key role in the invention of the atomic bomb, quoted these words from the ancient Hindu text known as the Bhagavad Gita: “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”

    Today, a very large segment of the scientific community is engaged in much the same behavior: Destroying our world through the incessant and utterly unscientific advocacy of dangerous, destructive interventions that threaten our food, our waterways and the very future of life on Earth.

    So-called “science,” it seems, may ultimately be the destroyer of life as we know it on our planet. And yet “science” is worshipped by its followers as the savior of life on Earth. There is a dangerous disconnect in that situation. Perhaps one of Biblical proportion.

    I suspect that one day a future alien civilization will study the history of humankind and attempt to determine how we destroyed ourselves. After sorting through the decomposed rubbish of the long-extinct human civilization, one alien will turn to the other alien and nod its head to say, “It seems their civilization was based on SCIENCE FRAUD.”

    P.S. For the record, I am not opposed to actual science, nor the use of the Scientific Method as one avenue through which wisdom may be gained. There are other methods of gaining wisdom, however, such as spirituality, meditation, the study of consciousness and even quantum connections between sentient beings. All of these non-science methods are utterly disregarded by the “scientific” community which believes so strongly in its own dogma that the brains of its top scientists have no room left for any ideas other than their own. That is, by the way, the very definition of a closed mind. It also happens to be the reason why conventional science only advances at the speed at which its dogmatic intellectual tyrants retire or perish.

    Suggested Reading:
    Some of my favorite books that have influenced my deeper understanding of real science:

    In Search of the Multiverse: Parallel Worlds, Hidden Dimensions, and the Ultimate Quest for the Frontiers of Reality by John Gribbon
    http://www.amazon.com/Search-Multiv&#8230;

    The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn
    http://www.amazon.com/Structure-Sci&#8230;

    Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner
    http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigm&#8230;

    The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena by Dean Radin
    http://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Uni&#8230;

    Articles Related to This Article:
    • In U.S., science is distorted to promote political and corporate agendas

    • Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

    • The false gods of scientific medicine revealed: It’s a cult, not a science

    • As cold fusion events demonstrate, modern science is ruled by conformity, not the search for scientific truth

    • “Unscientific” is secret code for anyone who opposes GMOs or pesticides

    • Cancer industry abandons science to keep pushing mammograms that harm women

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031073_science_tyranny.html#ixzz1IsHyIct0

    Posted in BIG PHARMA, FAKE FOOD BILL, FLU VACCINE LIES, FOOD, Food freedom, Garden indoors, genocide, Government lies, H1N1 HOAX, MONSANTO, NEW WORLD ORDER, NON GMO, POISONING, Population control, truth about our world, vaccine lies, vaccines | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

    The United States and Population Control

    Posted by angelbabe43 on April 7, 2011

    By Emil Jirado

    Reports have it that both the United States and the United Nations are endorsing the reproductive health bill. There will be a plenary debate on the measure come May 9 upon the resumption of session.

    But of course. The US and the UN are all for population control.

    Let’s rewind a bit to see how involved the US really is on population control. In December 1974, shortly after the first major international conference was held under UN auspices in Bucharest, Romania, several of the major US government agencies—the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department and the Agency for International Development)—submitted their inputs.

    Their contributions were combined into one report entitled “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth on US Security and Overseas Interests.” The final study was more than 200 pages long.

    That crucial document became what is known as NSSM 200. It stands for National Security Study Memorandum and the number 200 identified the order in which it was produced.

    Records show that the original request for a review of overseas population policies is also called NSSM 200, and was written April 27, 1974 by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. The actual study which covered 229 pages of text represents one stage of the NSSM 200 correspondence series, and was submitted on December 10, 1974. It became the official guide to foreign policy November 26, 1976, when a National Security Decision Memorandum (NSDM 314) was signed. It endorsed the findings of the study.

    Who actually was responsible for the study? NSSM was compiled by the National Security Council, which is the highest level of command in the US government. The NSC is headed by no less than the US President and his designated Security Advisor, and its purpose is to coordinate the overseas operations of all executive branches of the US government.

    Now, read this: Specifically, NSSM 200 targets 13 countries of “special US political and strategic interest,” which include India, Brazil, Egypt, Nigeria, Indonesia, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Mexico, Thailand, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia. Why? I will come to that later.

    ***

    The question is whether or not NSSM 200 is still in force. Records show that it still is, technically. It remains the official paper on population until it is replaced by another of equal importance. However, the implementation of the guidelines may differ from one administration to another.

    Former President Jimmy Carter, for example, showed considerably less interest in curbing population growth than did his predecessors, former US President Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. The Reagan administration took a somewhat different approach (i.e. the Mexico City policy that banned direct US financing for abortions). Records also show that funds for population control increased rapidly and dramatically during the Reagan and Bush years, but this did not necessarily indicate a new NSC direction.

    Why was the NSSM 200 only discovered in 1990? This is a highly classified document, which the public—much less the people of the developing countries affected—should not know about. But in the mid-1990s, there was a schedule for declassifying secret documents. The document was not actually made public until almost a year later, when it was given to the US National Archives in response to a request from an American journalist working for the Information Project for Africa.

    The reason reportedly for the document’s declassification is first, by 1990 at least, many of study’s recommendations for population control on aid-receiving countries had been achieved; and second, records also showed that the US had elected George Bush, a former CIA director, in 1988, which may have signaled to classification review personnel that the American public had grown more tolerant to covert US activities overseas.

    ***

    Now, we come to the reasons why the US wanted to control other countries’ population.

    NSSM, according to records and studies, showed US concern for population growth in the developing world threatening US security in four basic ways. First, certain large nations stand to gain significant political power and influence as a result. Second, the US and its western allies have a vital interest in strategic materials, like mineral and ore, which have to be imported from less-developed countries like the Philippines. Third, societies with high birth rates have large numbers of young people, who are more likely than older people to challenge global power structures. And last, population growth in relatively disadvantaged countries jeopardizes US investments. Santa Banana, the bottom line is US self-interest!

    The report cites Brazil that could benefit politically with population growth. Since Brazil clearly dominates the continent demographically, Brazil could outnumber US residents by the end of the century. This would give Brazil a growing power status not only in Latin America but on the world scene over the next 25 years. Nigeria, likewise with a growing population to number 135 million by the end of this century, would have political and strategic influence in Africa south of the Sahara.

    How does population control help the West acquire minerals? It is said that the location of vast reserves of higher-grade ores of most minerals favors increasing dependence of all industrialized regions on imports from less-developed countries. Studies show that the real problems of mineral supplies lie, not in basic sufficiency, but, in the politico-economic issues of access, terms of exploitation and exploration and division of the benefits.

    Another issue is the role of the youth. Records show that young people have historically been advocates for change and are more prone to confront imperialism. This is especially true in the Philippines with the youth now more involved in political and economic problems.

    There is also the issue of US commercial investments being affected by growing birth rates overseas. The NSSM 200 document points out that the growing nations are hard put in providing their growing needs. Thus, it warns, they are likewise to make increased demands of foreign investors. Thus under such circumstances, western corporate holdings are likely to be expropriated or subjected to arbitrary intervention.

    ***

    United States and United Nations policies repeatedly assert that birth control is necessary for development. This is also the core of the advocacy of population control through a reproductive health law. And the US and the UN do it by means of providing less-developed nations like the Philippines with grants and aids, like the involvement of the World Bank and other agencies of the United Nations in development.

    For instance, the NSSM 200 document advises the US government to play an important role in establishing the United Nations Fund for Population Activities to spearhead a multilateral effort in population as a complement to the bilateral actions of USAID and other donor countries.

    The document even asserts the need for mandatory programs like the appraisal of assistance to less-developed countries and their requirements.

    ***

    Now comes the rub. The NSSM 200 document requires US diplomatic and embassy officials to be alert to opportunities to demonstrate to the leaders of less-developed countries like the Philippines on the consequences of rapid population growth. That’s basically propaganda by imperialist America.

    This propaganda includes invitations to Washington extended to every leader of a less developed nation. That explains the yearly homage of every Philippine president to Washington.

    Simply put, the slower the Philippine population grows, the better for Washington.

    We must be blind if we don’t see through all these.

    www.manilastandardtoday.com

    http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideOpinion.htm?f=2011/april/5/emiljurado.isx&d=2011/april/5

    Related posts:

    1. The U.S. Economy : collapse of the economies of Iceland, Greece, Ireland, and, now, possibly Spain, is coming also to the United States.
    2. Sterilization Of Women In Brazil
    3. Chinese Model of Population Control Heralded as Global Warming Solution
    4. Population control as a solution to global warming – is anybody willing?
    5. World Bank Threatens “Drastic Steps Necessary” if Nations Refuse Population Reduction Implementation

    Short URL: http://oneworldscam.com/?p=14588

    Posted in genocide, Population control | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »